#Understand

20 posts loaded — scroll for more

Text
hpney-b33
hpney-b33

I understand this song so much…

⊹₊˚‧︵‿₊୨ᰔ୧₊‿︵‧˚₊⊹

Text
fulkem
fulkem

I want a world where the wicked are stopped and help accountable, not rewarded. That doesn’t ostracize and demonize the struggling and desperate. Where compassion, understanding, respect, love, empathy, and patience are recognized and valued for the strength they are

Text
fulkem
fulkem

Depending on who the victim was. In the usa rape was legal.

Assault was legal.

Child rape was legal.

Slavery was legal.

Murder was legal.

Theft was legal.

But depending on who the perpetrator is today, they still are

Text
lovepassionheart
lovepassionheart
Text
petitegoose
petitegoose
Text
fulkem
fulkem

To take the world from the wicked. We must first take back our minds

Text
cpopjukebox
cpopjukebox

領悟 (JerryC Remix) | Understand梁心颐 | Lara LiangRE

Text
thejerkmiser
thejerkmiser

Grabs steven and holds him close to my chest no you literally cannot take him from me he means too much . And then markiplier goes uhhhh but literally we’re in space. Yeahahhh we’re in space and im also your best friend sorryyy !!! And then steven goes flying through the big window and there is nothing i can do 🥺

Text
taniapiz-blog
taniapiz-blog

#Capire all'indietro, vivere in avanti/Understanding backwards, living forwards

La vita si può capire solo all’indietro, ma va vissuta in avanti.

Søren Kierkegaard

Life can only be understood backward, but must be lived forward.

Søren Kierkegaard

Text
muquesko
muquesko

Amelia is a very aggressive cat, and there’s her “don’t touch me hooman” room.

Text
muquesko
muquesko

*This particular series is deemed for kids, please don’t comment otherwise*

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*Camera used: iPhone 13 mini  

The location where the photo was taken: (I’d rather not say)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*Series: A Way to Understand*

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Kitty G. is so Cheeky, like any cat lols.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*Characters:

1. Kitty G. (cat, Nebelung)

2. Carl Bryd (human)

Text
alunah-lalunah
alunah-lalunah

If my dog ​​can’t see stars, then what is it that I can’t understand, that is right in front of my perception?

What we cannot understand, despite it being fully present in our perception, is not some exotic hidden structure of the universe. It is the conditions of intelligibility that already operate us. Just as a baby does not “see” Kant not because Kant is absent, but because the conceptual machinery required to make Kant intelligible has not yet formed so too there are structures that are fully operative in our life and perception but not yet available as objects of understanding.

Here is the decisive point. What is missing is not information, but a conceptual stance that has not yet stabilized.

Kant himself is the best example. Before we understood Kant, the same world was there with its causality, necessity, time, moral demand, objectivity. Nothing new appeared in perception when we grasped him. What changed was that we became able to see our own cognition as structured, rather than as transparent. Kant did not add content; he made conditions visible as conditions. That is the kind of understanding we’re talking about.

So what is now in front of your perception but not yet understood? Most likelythe way you still take certain necessities to be features of the world rather than features of your framework.

Not in theory we already know the doctrine but in practice. There are still places where our thinking treats something as “how things are,” when it is really “how things must appear to a nervous system.” These are not blind spots in perception, but blind spots in reflexivity. They are not inaccessible; they are simply not yet objectified.

This is why the dog analogy holds only up to a point. The dog lacks the capacity to form astronomical concepts. We do not lack the capacity to understand what we are missing. We lack only the map that would let us notice the necessity as necessity. And that is why a “new map” still matters. Not because it reveals a new world, but because it can expose another layer of constraint that was previously lived but not seen.

Importantly, whatever this is, it must be something that is present everywhere in our experience, stable across situations, and currently treated as obvious rather than questionable. That’s the rule. Babies don’t misunderstand Kant; Kant doesn’t exist for them. We are not misunderstanding what comes next; it doesn’t yet exist for us as an object of thought. When it does, it will feel trivial in hindsight just as Kant now does. That’s the mark of genuine understanding not awe, but inevitability.

What you do not yet understand is not hidden it is already governing you.

Text
darkcrimsonhearts
darkcrimsonhearts

I was wrong to hold you above everyone else. I now realise that no one should have been held to such high standards, except for me.

Text
theearthforce
theearthforce

There is a HUGH difference between
“logically understanding a spiritual concept”
and
“fully understanding that knowledge, thus forming a reunion with it, allowing it to become a part of you”.

Here are a couple of examples to show you why it’s the case:

Ex. 1:
I logically understood before that there is divine grace, but it wasn’t until recently when I managed to arrive at a pilgrimage site through divine intervention that I truly felt it, knowing that it truly exists and that I can rely on it.

Ex. 2:
Some people may have heard about how energy healing works, but it isn’t until they can sense and channel energy that they can truly do the healing work.

In general, logical understanding involves learning knowledge from external sources (e.g. books or other people) without experiencing it, while fully understanding it requires firsthand experience. The latter allows us to embody it. Our bodies know it and become resonant with it. Our subconscious believes it. We gain intuition about it.

Text
rxn-dot-png
rxn-dot-png
Text
adventumpueri
adventumpueri

kadaj is like three ladybugs on the windowsill

Text
peculiary
peculiary

Immortal Thor (2023) #15
September 4, 202
4

Text
dk-thrive
dk-thrive

Procrastination, this is called. I don’t want to think, I don’t want to know, I don’t want to understand. And yet I must. Must I not? Yes…
So where do I begin? At the beginning, perhaps.

— Karl Ove Knausgaard, The School of Night: A Novel. Martin Aitken, Translator. (Penguin Press, January 13, 2026)

Text
wisdomfish
wisdomfish

…Give me understanding that I may live.

Psalms 119:144

Text
fluffycreampuff56
fluffycreampuff56

If I get any mean anons, I’m not in the mood today I will get upset at you and/or block you, I’m not dealing with that