#relativity

20 posts loaded — scroll for more

Text
scienceguy22
scienceguy22

Einstein’s role in the atomic bomb.

The world’s first detonation of a nuclear device was called Trinity, conducted on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bombing range in New Mexico, about 120 miles (193 km) south of Albuquerque. It marked the first successful test of an atomic bomb developed under the Manhattan Project in Manhattan, NYC, led by J. Robert Oppenheimer & his brother, Frank, also a physicist at Los Alamos. They were both accused of having Communist ties. Under Senator Joseph McCarthy, thousands of Americans were accused of being Communists during the Cold War period, the Oppenheimers included. He had to resign his teaching position at the University of Minnesota & could no longer work as a physicist in the U.S. He was allowed, however, to teach physics at a high school. A review by the U.S. government reversed the decision of 1954, acknowledging that the original hearing was biased & unjust.

The amount of energy released was mind-blowing, equivalent to 21,000 tons of TNT (trinitrotoluene) or 42 million lbs (19,050,875 kg). Einstein’s connection to Trinity was indirect but foundational. He didn’t work on the Manhattan Project, was not present at the Trinity test, & had no security clearance to participate. His role was catalytic, though: his 1939 letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, co-signed with physicist Leo Szilard, warned that Nazi Germany might develop nuclear weapons. This letter helped spur the creation of the Manhattan Project, which ultimately produced the atomic bomb. Einstein’s equation E = mc² provided the conceptual basis for understanding how small amounts of mass could be converted into enormous amounts of energy—central to nuclear fission. When the atomic bomb exploded, it created a blazing fireball 2,000 ft (610 m) in diameter.

Einstein’s famous equation E = mc² says mass (m) is just another form of energy & the two can be converted into each other. Imagine a paperclip weighs about 1 gram (0.035 oz.); if you could convert that entire gram (its mass) into pure energy, it would release about 20,000 tons of TNT—roughly the size of the Trinity explosion. The speed of light squared explains why nuclear reactions release so much energy. It explains why stars shine; they convert mass into light & heat. The speed of light is the biggest number nature gives you, about 670,000 miles per hour (300,000 km per second), and multiply that by itself. Einstein discovered that mass & energy are connected through the geometry of spacetime. In that geometry, the speed of light is the fundamental scaling factor—like the ruler the universe uses. When you convert mass to energy, you’re not measuring speed—you’re converting one kind of stuff into another. The math of spacetime says the conversion requires c multiplied by, which is why you see E = mc². If the universe used only the speed of light itself, the energy in matter would be far smaller. But experiments—nuclear reactions, particle physics, stars—show that energy released is proportional to mass x c², not mass x c. Squaring c (or the speed of light) matches what nature actually does.

Oh, and one more thing. Today is National Pi Day, 3.14. And one last connection: today marks the death of that other celebrity physicist, Stephen Hawking. I think I’ll celebrate with a delicious slice of homemade blueberry pie.

Text
illegiblehandwriting1
illegiblehandwriting1

Yeah, sure, I’ll stick my face in the proverbial lion’s den.

Physicists, I am deeply curious to know your individual educated opinions on the concept of relativistic mass

Text
mamotreco
mamotreco
Text
thebearme
thebearme

hypothetically if there was an W axis for 4th dimension and it was time like Einstein said for relatively then if we master time; would we able to do alchemy?

Like making car oil with a chicken bone by making that bone speed to its future result with the 4th dimension, would it be possible?

been quietly oppressing over the 4th dimension for a year now and just found out about relativity help

Text
cosmonautroger
cosmonautroger

Albert Einstein, Relativity

Text
lenbryant
lenbryant

The universe is stretchy, like an old pair of underwear.

Text
joxter-coded
joxter-coded

Time being affected by both speed AND gravity? Shut up thats sci fi made up bullshit

Text
jonnestt
jonnestt

A fun part of black holes is that, as gravity increases, time slows down. Thus, space elongates.

So, as you’re falling into a black hole, and we’ll just assume that you wouldn’t fall apart at the event horizon, a consistent speed towards or away from it would get slower the deeper in you get.

To you, the slowing of time wouldn’t make a difference, because the light on its way to you is also slowing down. So your reference points would slow down too; result: you couldn’t measure the change. But because time slows down, your fall into the black hole would seem longer the further you get.

That’s why the distance to the singularity is infinite. It’s zenos paradox.

And that’s why there can’t be a singularity, or couldn’t if it weren’t for gravity being an acceleration rather than a force. There is a center, and it is a specific number of steps away from you, BUT the time you need to take each step grows with each step you’ve already taken. You’d simply never reach the singularity. Nothing, ever will.

Only once you manage to fly out again, you’d see the lost time pass as you move up the gravity well. It’d be a choice between watching the life you lost unfold, as it has already happened without you, or of living another one.


But of course, you’re not moving at a consistent velocity. You’re accelerating into the black hole. Now, I have to admit, I’d need to do some relativity math to compare the time dilation per distance to the speed per distance, and I’m too lazy to do that rn. So we’re just gonna take a high level view over the cases.

If you were accelerating as fast, or faster as time slows down, you’d actually reach the singularity. It’d be smack-dab in front of you.

And it wouldn’t even take that much time to reach it. But what the singularity looks like in that case is a case for quantum physics. My take is that all the fundamental particles would act like their wave representation. They’d constructively interfere to create a “singularity particle”. That “singularity particle” must have all the properties of all the particles which have reached the singularity added together. 

If you’re accelerating slower than time slows down, that is Zenos paradox, as I previously explained it. 

The further you get, the more time you need to take each step, thus you will get infinitely close to the singularity, but never reach it. Naturally that is true for every part of you, so you’d likely experience it like the distance to the singularity staying almost the same. If… the light from the singularity could move upwards from the gravity well… which it can’t.

But that also means, if we step outside of our dimensions, we’d see distance from each particle to the singularity decrease exponentially the closer it is. The closer it is the denser the distribution. So, from outside of our dimensions, we’d see… a cloud of quantum-soup… a round cloud that has a center you couldn’t dream to look through, but a cloud. Like planetary nebulae… or gas giants… or suns more like?

So, while, to you, it would just seem like it’s getting warmer, seen from outside of our dimensions, it’d be like the density increases until… there’s the original singularity. The smallest measurement of space that is possible, except there is, fractionally, more than one space per space.

It’s hard to describe what a singularity must be without getting poetic. So, I’ll start with the least poetic part. It’s probably just some random fluctuation that happened inside the star. Somewhere in that soup, two waves on the higgs field met and rolled over each other. As the amplitude of the higgs field is a measure of how fast space itself moves in a direction, they suddenly weren’t fast enough to get out of each other anymore. After all, the space they were trying to move through was moving them closer together. Which… yea, is just a microcosm of how black holes work.

Text
connectparanormal
connectparanormal
Text
iridescentalchemyst
iridescentalchemyst

Universal Law of Relativity: Finding Meaning Through Perspective

January 15, 2026

Ashley Marie

This article is written as part a series exploring the 12 Universal Laws, timeless principles that guide the flow of energy and influence the fabric of our reality. Each law, from the Law of Divine Oneness to the Law of Gender, represents a fundamental truth about how the universe operates and how we can harmonize with its rhythms to enhance our lives.

In this…

Text
daviddavi09
daviddavi09

Is the Speed of Light Really Constant? A Cosmic Test Just Challenged Einstein

Unlock the deepest cosmic secrets as we challenge one of the most fundamental rules of physics itself–the speed of light. Researchers at the Universitat Autönoma de Barcelona combined the measurements of very high energy gamma rays coming from distant cosmic sources to test whether photons of different energies travelled at the same speed. Maybe Einstein was wrong?

Text
daviddavi09
daviddavi09

Time Dilation Explained: How Traveling Near Light Slows Aging #shorts

Explore the mind-bending world of time dilation and see how relativity changes the way we experience time. From Einstein’s special and general relativity to the famous twin paradox, this video breaks down the science behind why moving fast or sitting in strong gravity can make your clock tick slower.
Learn how near-lightspeed space travel could let you return younger than your friends, why GPS satellites must have relativity corrections, and how muon, atomic clock, and particle accelerator experiments prove these effects are real. Learn about gravitational time dilation near massive objects, including black holes, and the surprising implications for aging, society, and future interstellar travel.

Text
daviddavi09
daviddavi09

Time Dilation Explained: Relativity, Twin Paradox & Gravity

Explore the mind-bending world of time dilation and see how relativity changes the way we experience time. From Einstein’s special and general relativity to the famous twin paradox, this video breaks down the science behind why moving fast or sitting in strong gravity can make your clock tick slower.
Learn how near-lightspeed space travel could let you return younger than your friends, why GPS satellites must have relativity corrections, and how muon, atomic clock, and particle accelerator experiments prove these effects are real. Learn about gravitational time dilation near massive objects, including black holes, and the surprising implications for aging, society, and future interstellar travel.

Text
noptisfinte
noptisfinte
Text
speckofconsciousness
speckofconsciousness

No babe you dick isn’t small you’re just moving too fast

Text
internutter
internutter

Challenge #04750-M001: All Alone, More or Less

Victoria Constance Emalia Stanford has had the most dreadful week. Her birthday voyage has ended in an oh so unfortunate shipwreck, her favorite dress is ruined, and she’s washed ashore on an island inhabited by volcano worshipping natives. But, what’s this? Their so called God king is so handsome, so hot, strong like stone.

Perhaps next week won’t be so bad…

A sequel to https://peakd.com/fiction/@internutter/challenge-04752-l365-his-little-sister – Deathshead419

On one hand, providence and the kind hand of the Allmighties had seen to it that she survived the wreck. The piece of decking she had found to cling to had washed her ashore. Safe enough, or at least alive. Providence had not ensured the preservation of her dress or the lack of salt or sand in her petticoats.

Victoria Constance Emalia Stanford, of the Fonstpring Stanfords, was barely able to drag herself to the high tide mark. Exhausted, pained, and in an unseemly appearance, she was forced to take her rest on the sands under the beating sun.

It was when she woke that Victoria bemoaned her fate. “Shipwrecked,” she cried. “Marooned without hope of seeing civilisation once more! How can I, a weak and fragile woman, possibly survive in this utter desolation?”

[Check the source for the rest of the story]

Text
tomoleary
tomoleary

M.C. Escher (1898-1972) Preliminary drawing for Relativity (circa 1953) Source

M.C. Escher (1898-1972) Relativity (1953) Source

Text
rahuldeora
rahuldeora

The property of matter is dual in nature It is relative in nature and it keeps changing. and another name of this is ‘desire’. Desire is relativity.

Explanation:

Property of matter is dual in nature:

  • This can refer to the dual nature of reality—like prakriti (matter/nature) and purusha (consciousness/spirit) in Samkhya philosophy. Matter (prakriti) exhibits duality in the sense that it manifests in opposites—pleasure/pain, gain/loss, etc.
  • In physics terms, you could think of it like wave-particle duality, but in Vedantic terms, it’s more about the mutable nature of the material world.

It is relative and keeps changing:

  • This is describing anitya—impermanence. All material phenomena are relative (samsara) and constantly changing. Nothing in the material realm is absolute or permanent.

Another name of this is ‘desire’

  • Desire in Sanskrit is kama. In Vedanta, desire arises because the mind identifies with the material world and its impermanent qualities. Desire is the relativity itself—because what you desire is always relative to your current state. You desire what you lack; when it’s fulfilled, the desire changes or shifts to something else.
  • So yes, desire is like a reflection of the ever-changing, relative nature of the material world (prakriti).

Desire is relativity

  • In Vedantic terms:
  • Desire (kama) comes from avidya (ignorance) about the true Self (Atman).
  • Because the world is relative, the mind is always swinging between opposites—like and dislike, pleasure and pain, success and failure.
  • Therefore, desire itself cannot be fixed; it is relative, always conditioned by time, place, and situation.

So, in short, from the Sanatan Vedic perspective:

The dual, relative, ever-changing nature of matter (prakriti) manifests as desire (kama) in the mind. Desire is the personal, experiential reflection of the world’s inherent relativity.

Additional perspectives:

Vedanta (Advaita Vedanta)

Vedanta teaches that Brahman (the Self) is absolute, non-dual, and unchanging, while the material world is Māyā—relative and impermanent.

  • The world appears dual: pleasure–pain, mine–not mine.
  • Because everything is relative, the mind compares and desire (kāma) arises.
  • Desire is not of the Self; it belongs to the mind (antaḥkaraṇa) operating in Māyā.

Key idea:

Desire exists only in relativity; the Self is desireless because it is complete.

When one mistakes the relative world for reality, desire binds the soul. Realization of the absolute dissolves desire naturally.

2. Buddhism

Buddhism directly supports your statement “Desire is relativity.”

  • All conditioned things are impermanent (anicca) and without fixed essence.
  • Because things are unstable, craving (taṇhā) arises.
  • Craving is caused by ignorance and comparison—wanting things to be different than they are.

Second Noble Truth:

Craving is the cause of suffering.

Since nothing has permanent value, attachment to relative experiences leads to dissatisfaction. When one sees the impermanent and relative nature of phenomena clearly, craving fades, leading to nirvāṇa.

3. Bhagavad Gita

The Gita clearly links duality, desire, and bondage.

Krishna teaches:

  • The material world is ruled by pairs of opposites (dvandva).
  • From contact with sense objects arises desire (kāma).
  • Desire leads to attachment, anger, and suffering.

Core teaching (paraphrased):

From contemplation of sense objects arises attachment; from attachment arises desire.

Krishna urges Arjuna to go beyond duality:

“Be free from the pairs of opposites.”

When one acts without attachment to results, desire loses its grip and the mind becomes steady.

Unified Spiritual Conclusion

Across Vedanta, Buddhism, and the Gita:

  • The material world is dual and relative
  • Relativity gives rise to desire
  • Desire causes bondage and suffering
  • Freedom comes from realizing the absolute / impermanent nature of reality

So your insight can be summarized spiritually as:

Desire is not an intrinsic truth—it is a product of relativity. Transcending relativity dissolves desire.

Text
raindoor
raindoor

The Blueshift Ring

Written for @flashfictionfridayofficial #FFF 335 “Out of Orbit”.

I apologize if I got parts of the science wrong. But to help you visualize a band of blue-shifted stars near a black hole’s event horizon, there are great images in this Physics Stack Exchange page. The image below is from there.

Original work

Words: 991

Gen / Gen, no warnings apply

Summary:

As a ship flies past a black hole’s event horizon, the pilot notices that the blueshift of the visible stars is unexpectedly increasing. The realization of what that means brings equal measure of happiness and dread to the characters.

Read on AO3 or under the cut.

A band of stars curving along the black hole horizon, appearing much bigger and brighter than they are because of blueshift.ALT
[[MORE]]

I was floating down the main corridor when, for one instant, the ship stuttered. I only use this word because I have never heard the ship engines emit this particular pitch. The engine drone had so thoroughly blended into the background that I couldn’t hear it anymore - right until now, when it shifted a quarter tone higher. Something happened.

I wondered if it was the one percent chance event for which I …

(had deeply hoped)

… had Hieph sign the waiver for. Hieph, smart as ce is (I would not be crazy about cir otherwise) had a realistic estimation of risk. A fly-by of a black hole event horizon does involve a probability of the ship getting pulled out of orbit. Miscalculations can happen as the physics here is not well-understood.

But Hieph could not pass up a chance to see the universe blue-shifted, and you won’t see that without getting close to the black hole’s event horizon. I myself can’t get enough of it even after decades orbiting it. Therefore Hieph and I are perfect for each other. Ce has to realize it soon enough.

“Did you hear it? What’s up with the engines?” came a message from Hieph, who had been resting in cir room.

The engines were straining; I heard it now. They were trying to avoid crossing the boundary past which an escape from black hole is impossible. But the ship was already balancing on a knife’s edge, getting as close as it could without being drawn in, all for a better observation of gravitational effects. There was hardly any error margin. If the engines were straining, the boundary has been crossed. I might as well turn them off: they were useless now. Our only path now led towards the black hole’s singularity.

One moment you had a future with many choices; the next moment they all have closed. I never thought I would feel so calm and content realizing that.

“I’m looking into it. I’ll let you know ASAP,” I replied.

I needed to be sure I was right. Ordinarily I’d go to the console room with its multiple wraparound screens, collect some data and launch calculations. But as I floated past the observation room, with its huge windows looking out into space, a thought struck me.

A giant ring of stars was visible through the windows, as usual. We spent so many hours at it with Hieph. It was half a ring, to be exact. It curved along the black hole’s event horizon; a whole universe’s worth of stars were condensed into one irregular band, thanks to the relativistic effects; the stars appeared much brighter than normal, thanks to blueshift. It was as if you took a donut and threw a fistful of sprinkles over it, letting them fall wherever they may; when you take the donut away, the band of sprinkles left on the table would be like the band you see through an observation window. Our “sprinkles” are not rainbow colored; they are mostly white, like salt crystals. But as we fall into a black hole, another comparison will become apparent.

A plan sprung in my mind and I responded to Hieph. “Come to the observation room! And bring a towel!”

“Why?”

“You’ll see! I want to show you something!”

I greeted Hieph in the hallway. Ce looked wary, but brought a towel as I asked.

“I need to blindfold you now so it would be a surprise to you,” I said. Hieph was taken aback, but allowed it. Ce had a sense of adventure and trusted my judgment, which is yet another reason why ce was the only person I wanted in my life. I wrapped the towel over cir eyes and steered ce into the room; using the handholds, I maneuvered both of us to a certain spot. The stars were cooperating. The curved band was much narrower now, the dots in it brighter and closer together. Blueshift was increasing.

Even without the calculations I knew we had indeed crossed the black hole event horizon. Hieph would understand it too as soon as the blindfold was removed: ce knew the science.

But first, I hoped, ce would see the metaphor.

I raised cir hand, gently bending its fingers, and positioned it against the band of stars like closely-packed, painfully dazzling diamonds. I carefully adjusted the shape of cir hand so that the band formed a graceful arch above a bent knuckle of cir ring finger.

I pulled off the blindfold. “Hieph! This ring is my promise to you to stand with you whatever comes.” I flinched a little at the superfluousness of it: as if I was physically capable of doing anything but. But I continued. “Will you spend your life with me?”

Ce looked back at me with alarm; then looked at the stars as the comprehension and terror dawned on cir face.

“What happened?” Ce hissed, trying to squeeze sounds of cir throat, but producing a mere helpless squeak. “Why so much blueshift?”

“We are inside the event horizon now,” I said. “As I’m sure you realized.”

Ce pushed away from me, sending me into the wall. “Show me the calculations! This can’t be happening!”

Ce dove for the exit and sailed towards the console room. I hurried after cir.

“Don’t worry!” I shouted. “You know that this black hole is a billion solar masses, and its event horizon is billions of miles! We will spend our whole lives falling into it before we even notice the tidal forces. We will be long dead before we are spaghettified! Think of the amazing physics we’ll see!”

I realized then that ce had not given me an answer to my question. It was not necessary, of course: the question was a pure formality. The answer could not be anything but “yes”, or I would not have had the courage to ask it. The trajectories of our lives converged in the singularity ahead.

Text
lenbryant
lenbryant

Ever now?