#frameworks

20 posts loaded — scroll for more

Text
darfler4tburg
darfler4tburg

I appreciate the pattern style presentation of these communication tools.

Text
kestrokes-blog
kestrokes-blog

Who Am I?

A First Contemplation on Identity and the Creative Nature of Awareness

Most people answer the question “Who am I?” with the most immediate identifiers available to them. They might state their name, describe their profession, reference their age, or speak about their background and experiences. These answers feel natural because they reflect the social and personal categories through which we organize our lives.

However, if we examine those answers more carefully, something interesting begins to emerge. Your name cannot truly be you, because it was given to you. Your profession cannot be you either, because it can change. Your personality evolves over time as you learn, mature, and adapt to new circumstances. Even your body, which often feels like the most obvious candidate for identity, is constantly changing at a biological level. Yet despite all of these changes, there remains a persistent sense that you are still you.

This raises a deeper question: if the elements of identity we commonly reference are all capable of changing, what is the constant that remains behind them?

One way to approach this question is to consider human experience as occurring simultaneously across three distinct but interconnected planes: the physical plane, the intellectual plane, and the spiritual plane. These planes are not meant to be understood strictly in religious terms; rather, they represent layers through which our experience of life unfolds.

The physical plane refers to the material world. It includes our bodies, our environment, and the events that occur in time and space. This is the level at which we interact with objects, perform actions, and experience the direct consequences of physical cause and effect.

The intellectual plane represents the realm of the mind. Thoughts, reasoning, interpretation, imagination, beliefs, memory, and language all exist here. This is the layer through which we make sense of our experiences and develop internal models of the world.

Then there is the spiritual plane, which can be understood most simply as Awareness itself. It is the fundamental capacity to observe experience. You are aware of your thoughts. You are aware of sensations in your body. You are aware of the environment around you. That Awareness precedes the content of what is being experienced.

This distinction matters because anything that can be observed cannot ultimately be what you are. You can observe your body, which means the body exists within your Awareness. You can observe your thoughts, which means thoughts also exist within your awareness. Even emotions and beliefs can be noticed, examined, and changed over time.

What remains constant through all of this is the observer—the quiet but undeniable sense of presence that experiences these changing elements.

In this framework, human identity can be understood as follows: we are Awareness operating through a mind within a physical world. Awareness sits at the deepest layer. The mind functions as the interface through which Awareness interprets experience. The body and environment form the arena in which actions take place.

Many people unconsciously reverse this order. They assume they are primarily physical beings who occasionally have thoughts and perhaps touch something spiritual. But when examined carefully, experience suggests a different hierarchy. First there is Awareness. That Awareness expresses itself through the intellectual faculties of the mind. Through the mind, it acts within the physical environment.

Recognizing this structure naturally leads to another important question: if we are fundamentally Awareness, how does that Awareness influence or shape the reality we experience?

Awareness does not interact with the physical world directly. Instead, it operates through the intellectual plane. The mind serves as the intermediary through which Awareness engages with the world. Thoughts, interpretations, expectations, and beliefs form the lens through which we perceive and respond to the environment.

This lens plays a powerful role in shaping our experience. Two individuals may encounter the same circumstances but interpret them in entirely different ways. One person may perceive limitation, while another sees opportunity. Although the external situation is identical, the internal interpretation changes how each person responds to it.

Over time, these interpretations influence behavior. Beliefs affect what we pay attention to, what risks we are willing to take, and how we respond to setbacks or opportunities. Behavior then produces outcomes, and those outcomes gradually reshape the environment we inhabit.

In this way, Awareness influences reality through a chain of influence: Awareness shapes the mind, the mind shapes behavior, and behavior shapes physical outcomes.

An especially important capability within the intellectual plane is imagination. Imagination allows the mind to simulate possibilities before they exist in physical form. Athletes visualize their performance before competing. Architects imagine structures before they are built. Entrepreneurs picture solutions before companies are formed.

Through imagination, Awareness can explore potential futures and rehearse identities before they manifest physically. The ideas we consistently return to, the expectations we reinforce, and the identities we mentally inhabit begin to shape how we move through the world. As our behavior shifts in alignment with those internal patterns, the external conditions of our lives gradually evolve as well.

Understanding the interaction of these three planes offers a useful perspective on personal change. Many attempts to change life focus exclusively on the physical layer—on altering circumstances or external conditions. While those efforts can certainly matter, they often overlook the deeper leverage that exists within the intellectual plane and the Awareness behind it.

By examining our beliefs, questioning our assumptions, and becoming conscious of the mental patterns that guide our perception, we begin working at a more foundational level of influence.

This returns us to the original question.

Who am I?

At the deepest level, you are not merely a name, a profession, or a body moving through events. You are the Awareness that experiences thoughts, emotions, and physical sensations while directing a mind that operates within the world.

And as Awareness becomes more conscious of itself, it gains the ability to shape the patterns of thought that influence behavior and ultimately shape reality itself.

Understanding this may be the beginning of living less as a passive reactor to circumstances and more as an intentional participant in the unfolding of one’s own life.

Text
summoningspark
summoningspark
Text
estateplanning7mds2l
estateplanning7mds2l

What Are Digital Assets in Estate Planning?

Finding the right “Navigating Digital Assets in Estate Planning: Essential Steps for Protecting Your Online Legacy” service shouldn’t feel like a gamble. Yet too often, it does. You read reviews, compare prices, and still wonder: will they actually deliver what they promise? In today’s hyper-connected world, our digital footprint is vast and complex, making it crucial to include digital assets in your estate plan. But where do you start?

Quick Answer:

Digital assets in estate planning are online or electronic assets you own, including social media, cryptocurrency, and digital files. To protect your online legacy, start by identifying and cataloging these assets, understand applicable legal frameworks like the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA), and clearly communicate access instructions to your heirs. Proper planning ensures your digital life is handled according to your wishes after death.

What Are Digital Assets in Estate Planning?

Digital assets refer to any content or account that exists electronically and holds value. This includes everything from social media profiles, email accounts, and cloud storage to cryptocurrencies, domain names, and even digital photos or music libraries. In estate planning, these assets are treated as part of your overall estate because they can have both sentimental and monetary value.

According to a 2022 survey by Caring.com, only about 30% of people include digital assets in their estate plans, despite the growing importance of these belongings. This gap highlights a critical oversight for many families.

How to Identify and Catalog Your Digital Assets

Start with a thorough inventory. Think broadly and methodically:

List all online accounts (social media, email, financial, shopping, subscription services)

Include digital currencies like Bitcoin or NFTs

Note digital files stored in clouds or on devices (documents, photos, videos)

Record usernames, passwords, and security questions securely

Use a secure password manager or dedicated digital estate planning tool to organize this information. Remember, keeping credentials updated and accessible to a trusted person or executor is key.

Understanding Legal Frameworks and Ensuring Access for Heirs

The legal landscape for digital assets is evolving. The Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA), adopted in most U.S. states, empowers fiduciaries to access digital accounts with proper authorization. However, service providers like Google or Facebook have their own policies and may require specific procedures or documentation.

To ensure your heirs can access your online accounts:

Include digital asset directives in your will or a separate digital estate plan

Appoint a digital executor or fiduciary experienced with digital assets

Use online tools some providers offer for legacy contacts or account memorialization

Estate planning attorneys report that cases involving digital assets are becoming more common — approximately 40% of estate plans they encounter now include digital considerations. This trend shows increasing awareness but also underlines the need for specialized guidance.

Text
naveenhomestuff
naveenhomestuff

Validating Your MVP with AI - Agilemania

Join our 3-hour Validating Your MVP with AI workshop to test assumptions, reduce risk, and make smarter product decisions using AI-powered techniques. Learn practical frameworks to gather real insights, refine hypotheses, and accelerate product-market fit.

Text
dr-afsaeed
dr-afsaeed

“Cytokine-Mediated tumor sensitization: mechanistic frameworks and therapeutic opportunities in cancer Immunotherapy” - Research

Cytokines are pivotal regulators of immune responses and inflammation, and their dysregulation is implicated in cancer initiation and progression. A deeper understanding of cytokine-mediated modulation of tumor cell behavior may uncover novel therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using keywords…

Text
pythonjobsupport
pythonjobsupport

13. Advanced Data Architecture, Review All , Data Architecture Principles and Enterprise Frameworks

These sources primarily cover topics in advanced data architecture, focusing heavily on both data governance and security and …
source

Quote
justadandak
justadandak
In the decades to come, creativity will be key to doing most jobs well. In this article the authors offer a new typology that breaks creative thinking into four types: <br/> - integration, or showing that two things that appear different are the same; <br/> - splitting, or seeing how things that look the same are more usefully divided into parts; <br/> - figure-ground reversal, or realizing that what is crucial is not in the foreground but in the background; and <br/> - distal thinking, which involves imagining things that are very different from the here and now. <br/> Most of us tend to think in just one of those four ways. But we can hone our ability to be creative in other dimensions. Managers need to understand both their own strengths and how to balance the types of thinking across their teams to successfully execute creative projects. And organizations can use this typology to optimize innovation across the workforce.
Cultivating the Four Kinds of Creativity
Text
newstech24
newstech24

Amazon fixes up Fire television, introduces its really own ‘Artline’ televisions with structures at CES

Amazon is presenting a Fire television redesign that positions added concentrate on the web content, while furthermore simplifying the browsing and format. The upgrade stands for the first significant Fire television launch in years from an individual experience perspective, business insurance claims, and is supported by a freshened variation of the Fire tv application and the arrival of…

Text
pythonjobsupport
pythonjobsupport

MSBA 604 - S3: Data Governance Frameworks Made Simple (Cohorts 2 & 5)

This session extensively explores data governance principles and frameworks, culminating in a detailed analysis of their …
source

Text
pythonjobsupport
pythonjobsupport

2.1 Overview of popular data governance frameworks

COURSE: Federated Data Governance: A Comprehensive Tutorial on Regulatory Compliance About the Course The FAME …
source

Text
raihantex-blog
raihantex-blog

Quality Assurance: Sample Policy Frameworks for Bangladesh’s Garment Manufacturing Industry

Quality Assurance (QA) is a crucial aspect of garment manufacturing, particularly in a country like Bangladesh, which is one of the leading garment producers in the world. QA frameworks help ensure that products meet specified requirements and adhere to international standards. This article explores the significance of QA in Bangladesh’s garment industry, outlines effective policy frameworks, and…

Text
voittoinsights
voittoinsights

The Quiet but Ruthless Problem-Solving Secrets of CEOs !

If you’ve ever watched a CEO glide into a crisis meeting looking calm enough to host a yoga retreat—while inside the company is burning like a Diwali rocket gone rogue—you’ve probably wondered:

“How do these people solve problems so fast… and why do my own problems behave like Ekta Kapoor’s serial villains who refuse to die?”

Welcome to the real problem-solving playbook of CEOs—decoded,…

Text
newstech24
newstech24

Framework’s franken-laptop is again with massive chip upgrades and acquainted frustrations

Framework did it once more. It promised modular, upgradeable, and user-repairable laptops the place different producers dare not enterprise or have outright failed. And it’s delivered.

The 2025 model of the Framework Laptop computer 16 comes with not solely new AMD Ryzen AI CPU choices, but in addition Wi-Fi 7, a extra highly effective USB-C charger, redesigned cooling, and a brand new webcam —…

Text
lostconsultants
lostconsultants

The Best Practice Myth: Why Copying Others Destroys Real Progress

The best practice myth is one of the most comforting lies in modern organisations. We see a successful company, watch a shiny conference talk, or read a LinkedIn post and think, “We should do it like them.” It feels smart, efficient, and safe. But the truth is — copying what worked elsewhere often kills the very progress it promises to create.

The Copycat Comfort Zone

Let’s be honest: copying…

Text
multiplydifficult
multiplydifficult

Haven’t really thought all of this through, just some vague musings / thinking alouds but we just read a very good anti-psych post about someone’s experiences. This person had voices that they viewed as Parts Of Themself.

[[MORE]]

This is an interesting framework to read about for others and we like understanding other’s experiences. It is not a framework that works for us. This is fine. However i have some discomfort reading about this person’s (or anyone’s) Parts framework, i think because there is very little wider social understanding / acceptance of the “people sharing a body” framework we prefer, so to some extent we have a little amount of discomfort over anything reinforcing the Parts framework.

There’s also some thoughts here about the word “plural”

I can’t remember if it was in the article itself but at least the tumblr post that linked it referred to it as plurality.

My understanding of the plurality framework is that of seperate autonomous entities in one’s head. I don’t see how Parts of oneself can be seperate autonomous entities, because if they are you then they aren’t seperate autonomous entites.

At the same time, plural was coined as both a grassroots term to move away from the association with psychiatry of the term “multiple” (though that’s not been a formal diagnosis in decades, so the argument for that is not so strong these days) which is something i appreciate, and as a broad umbrella term, which i like in theory but am also getting a little critical of.

Because there was a screenshot of a tag i saw a couple years back where someone basically said “i appreciate knowing about plurality because i have a strong sense of identity / interests etc, but occasionally that shifts and it felt like a betrayal of my identity, but plurality helped me to accept that these are both me.”

I still maintain that that is not using a plural framework, that is a using a singlet framework on an experience that could be construed as plurality.

And with plurality as a spectrum, the understanding of it is usually “singlet with mildly dissociated parts -> median system with distinct parts that feel kinda like people -> fully multiple.” The implication here being that the spectrum is about level of dissociation between parts, which means that if someone says “i am in a plural system and we understand each other to be people,” external people are likely to understand “this is one person with such distinct parts they feel like people” not “this is people sharing a body.”

Which to me, again, is a fundamentally singlet way of understanding plurality.

It feels very reminiscent of how people frequently say stuff like “neurodiversity isn’t just autism & adhd, it’s NPD and BPD and ASPD and COD and schizophrenia and psychotic disorders and anxiety disorders and…” like, first neurodiversity refers to how everyone thinks different and this is a fundamentally neutral statement, “neurotypicals” are included in neurodiversity. Second, yes, if you fit the criteria for those disorders you are neurodivergent. However the the neurodiversity framework is not just about making up nicer terms for the psychiatric framework? It’s a totally different framework. People can be neurodivergent without meeting psychiatric criteria for any disorder. (and yeah, part of the problem is the lack of grassroots language. Also the people who shut down non-disorder grassroots terminology because they don’t understand wtf a framework is.)

Like the singlet & psychiatric frameworks are so deeply ingrained that often people who ostensibly prefer those frameworks are still often fundamentally viewing the underlying experience through the dominant lens and have mostly just adjusted their language about it.

Text
lionmageaz
lionmageaz

A Full-Stack Developer Is A Myth - DEV Community

A Full-Stack Developer Is A Myth - DEV Community https://share.google/YKBztnTUJ7dl92Qtn

Oh, I’ve been waiting for this article for years!

Text
bdarfler
bdarfler

“OARB framework (Observation, Assertion, Repercussion, Benefit)”

Another great framework from Wes Kao, similar to the SBI framework (Situation, Behavior, Impact)

Text
lastenline
lastenline

Finished an ogre and a mind flayer.

Text
kevinmarville
kevinmarville

ModelCastsOptimizerTrait

github.com/laravel/framework/discussions/31778
The ModelCastOptimizerTrait gives you flexible, high-performance handling of Laravel model attributes when using custom casted, making it ideal for complex or large-scale projects… Especially casting behavior wished to be avoid as default, for speed or data integrity reasoms