#dna

20 posts loaded — scroll for more

Text
sgsindia002
sgsindia002

Analyzing crop plant genomes through molecular methods and markers for improvement, characterization and trait tracking.

Molecular methods, including DNA marker analyses, are now an indispensable tool for accelerating plant breeding and research projects. Such methods allow the characterization of individual plants for their genetic composition at an early stage and at levels that have previously not been possible. Genotyping arrays are also routinely used for tracking interesting and novel traits and for Genomic Selection.

Text
rae-s-drawings
rae-s-drawings
Text
cuteycablemonster
cuteycablemonster

Truffle expression practice!! Uncolored & colored version ♧

Text
fkajackiebrownx
fkajackiebrownx

Tom’s Diner - Suzanne Vega, DNA🎶

Text
furiouswindfulcrum
furiouswindfulcrum

‘India’s DNA is to win trophies, ours is to lose’: Rashid Latif tears into Pakistan cricket - WATCH | Cricket News - The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Pakistan’s poor performance in the recently concluded T20 World Cup continues to attract criticism from various quarters. Former Pakistan captain Rashid Latif has now launched a sharp attack on the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB).Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW!Pakistan crashed out of the T20 World Cup after reaching the Super 8 stage of the…


View On WordPress

Text
articlepublication
articlepublication

How to Extract High Molecular Weight DNA Without Shearing

Key Takeaways:-

  • Gentle sample handling is crucial to prevent DNA fragmentation during extraction and maintain the integrity required for genomic analysis.
  • Avoiding vortexing, rapid pipetting, and harsh mechanical mixing significantly reduces the chances of DNA shearing during preparation.
  • Optimized purification methods, such as magnetic bead workflows, help maintain long DNA fragments during extraction.
  • Proper storage conditions and minimal freeze‑thaw cycles preserve DNA integrity after extraction.
  • High‑quality DNA improves sequencing performance and enables reliable genomic analysis for modern sequencing platforms.
  • FAQs

Extracting intact genomic DNA is a crucial step in many modern genomics workflows. Researchers working with advanced sequencing technologies often require long DNA fragments that remain structurally intact throughout the extraction process. When DNA breaks during extraction, the results can negatively affect downstream experiments, reduce sequencing accuracy, and limit the ability to study complex genomic structures. Because of this, laboratories around the world focus on improving their extraction workflows and minimizing mechanical damage during processing.

High-quality DNA extraction is especially important for applications that rely on very long DNA fragments. Scientists studying structural variants, genome assemblies, and epigenetic modifications depend on intact molecules to obtain meaningful results. Maintaining DNA integrity during extraction is therefore essential. Careful handling, optimized protocols, and appropriate reagents help researchers perform High Molecular Weight DNA Isolation successfully while minimizing unwanted fragmentation during the process.

DNA Shearing During Extraction

DNA shearing occurs when large DNA molecules break into smaller fragments due to physical or chemical stress. Mechanical forces are the most common cause of fragmentation during extraction workflows. Pipetting vigorously, vortexing samples, or forcing DNA through narrow tips can introduce shear stress that breaks long DNA strands into smaller pieces. Even repeated mixing steps can slowly degrade DNA integrity if the sample is not handled carefully.

Chemical factors can also contribute to fragmentation. Harsh buffers, excessive enzymatic digestion, or improper storage conditions may weaken DNA molecules and make them more prone to breakage. When the DNA fragments become too short, sequencing performance can suffer. This is particularly problematic for technologies designed to read long DNA molecules. As a result, laboratories aiming to preserve large fragments must design extraction protocols that protect DNA structure from the earliest stages of sample preparation.

Importance of Preserving Long DNA Fragments

Preserving long DNA fragments allows scientists to analyze genomic information with greater accuracy and resolution. Long fragments provide better coverage of repetitive regions and complex structural variations that shorter reads may fail to detect. These advantages have become increasingly important in genomic research, particularly with the rapid adoption of long-read sequencing platforms that depend on intact DNA molecules.

When DNA remains intact during extraction, researchers can achieve longer sequencing reads and improved genome assemblies. Long fragments also allow better identification of insertions, deletions, and structural rearrangements within genomes. Because of these benefits, many genomics laboratories prioritize extraction techniques that maintain DNA length and purity. Proper sample preparation ultimately determines whether sequencing experiments succeed or produce incomplete genomic data.

Sample Preparation and Gentle Handling

One of the most effective ways to prevent DNA shearing is to handle samples gently throughout the extraction process. Biological samples such as tissues, cells, or blood should be processed carefully to avoid unnecessary mechanical stress. Grinding or homogenizing tissues too aggressively can break DNA molecules before extraction even begins. Using mild lysis conditions helps release DNA without damaging its structural integrity.

Pipetting technique also plays a crucial role in maintaining DNA length. Researchers should avoid rapid pipetting or repeated aspiration cycles that can generate strong shear forces. Instead, slow and steady pipetting with wide-bore tips helps reduce mechanical damage. These simple handling strategies significantly improve the success of High Molecular Weight DNA Isolation, especially when working with delicate genomic samples.

Choosing the Right Lysis and Extraction Method

Selecting an appropriate extraction method is essential for preserving long DNA fragments. Traditional column-based purification methods can sometimes lead to fragmentation because DNA molecules may be forced through small membranes. While these methods are convenient, they may not always be ideal for applications requiring very large DNA fragments.

Alternative purification strategies often rely on gentle binding and separation techniques. Magnetic bead-based purification methods are commonly used because they allow DNA molecules to bind to beads without excessive mechanical stress. These systems also simplify washing steps and reduce the need for repeated centrifugation. When optimized correctly, these workflows can maintain DNA integrity and produce samples suitable for demanding genomic analyses.

Minimizing Mechanical Stress During Processing

Mechanical stress is one of the main causes of DNA breakage during extraction. Many routine laboratory practices unintentionally introduce shear forces that fragment long DNA molecules. Vortexing samples, rapidly mixing reagents, or performing excessive centrifugation can all contribute to unwanted fragmentation. Reducing these steps wherever possible helps maintain DNA quality throughout the extraction process.

Gentle mixing methods are often recommended for DNA extraction workflows. Instead of vortexing, researchers can mix samples by slowly inverting tubes or gently rotating them. This approach allows reagents to distribute evenly without introducing strong mechanical forces. Careful handling at each stage helps ensure that DNA fragments remain intact and suitable for downstream applications that require high-quality genomic material.

Optimizing Purification Conditions

The purification stage plays a crucial role in maintaining DNA integrity. Improper washing steps or harsh buffer conditions may weaken DNA molecules and increase the risk of fragmentation. Optimizing buffer composition and incubation times helps protect DNA while removing contaminants that could interfere with sequencing reactions.

Temperature control is another important factor during purification. Excessive heat can damage DNA and reduce fragment length. Performing extraction steps at appropriate temperatures helps maintain molecular stability and preserve long DNA fragments. When purification conditions are carefully optimized, laboratories can consistently obtain samples that perform well in downstream genomic workflows.

Storage and Handling After Extraction

Once DNA has been successfully extracted, proper storage is essential to maintain its integrity. Long DNA fragments remain vulnerable to degradation if samples are repeatedly thawed or exposed to harsh conditions. Storing DNA at appropriate temperatures and minimizing freeze-thaw cycles helps preserve molecular stability over time.

Researchers also need to handle extracted DNA carefully during subsequent experiments. Excessive pipetting, repeated transfers, or aggressive mixing can still cause fragmentation even after purification. Protecting DNA samples during storage and handling ensures that the benefits of High Molecular Weight DNA Isolation are preserved until the DNA is used in sequencing or other genomic analyses.

Role of DNA Quality in Advanced Sequencing Technologies

Modern sequencing technologies increasingly rely on long DNA molecules to produce high-quality genomic data. Platforms designed for long-read sequencing require DNA fragments that remain intact over tens or even hundreds of kilobases. When DNA becomes fragmented during extraction, sequencing reads become shorter and may not capture complex genomic regions effectively.

Maintaining DNA integrity, therefore, plays a direct role in sequencing success. Longer DNA fragments enable better genome assembly, improved detection of structural variants, and a more accurate representation of repetitive regions. For these reasons, laboratories investing in advanced sequencing technologies often focus heavily on optimizing their extraction workflows to preserve DNA length and quality.

FAQs

What causes DNA shearing during extraction?

DNA shearing usually occurs due to mechanical stress such as vortexing, aggressive pipetting, excessive centrifugation, or forcing DNA through narrow tips. These actions create shear forces that break long DNA molecules into smaller fragments.

Why is high molecular weight DNA important for sequencing?

High molecular weight DNA enables longer sequencing reads, better genome assembly, and improved detection of structural variations. Many advanced sequencing technologies depend on intact DNA molecules for accurate results.

How can DNA shearing be minimized during extraction?

DNA shearing can be minimized by using gentle mixing techniques, slow pipetting, wide‑bore tips, optimized buffers, and avoiding unnecessary mechanical stress during sample processing.

Which extraction methods help maintain DNA integrity?

Magnetic bead‑based purification and carefully optimized lysis protocols are commonly used methods that help maintain long DNA fragments while removing contaminants effectively.

Extracting intact genomic DNA requires careful attention to every step of the workflow. Discover reliable magnetic bead solutions for DNA purification and sequencing workflows. Explore high-quality genomic kits available from MagBio Genomics today. For expert guidance, call (301) 302-0144.

Text
glowwithinyou
glowwithinyou
Text
throughthetreesblog
throughthetreesblog

23andMe: An Unfortunate Update

I wish I had better news. Just after releasing a subscriber-only beta version of DNA Relatives Clustering, 23andMe technically has restored limited access to their chromosome browser, Advanced DNA Comparison. In October 2023, 23andMe removed Advanced DNA Comparison and Relatives in Common after becoming aware of a data breach. While 23andMe partially resurrected Relatives in Common some time ago, segment data downloads, the segment overlap (triangulation) indicator, and Advanced DNA Comparison had remained under lock and key. To some degree, they still are.

23andMe will only allow you to see the chromosome browser and the segment overlap indicator, what were once standard features, if and only if you have tested on 23andMe’s V5 chip for “Ancestry+Health” and have subscribed to 23andMe+. Even if you do that, “[y]ou can only compare your own profile (or profiles you manage within your account, or connected profiles) against your DNA relatives and connections.”

In other words, 23andMe’s non-subscribers who had been awaiting the return of the site’s most valuable tools must pay a ransom for a watered-down revamp. And even if you subscribe, one subscription only applies to a single profile. If you manage a multi-profile account and want to use Advanced DNA Comparison across all profiles, then it appears you must pay a separate subscription fee for each profile on your account. And each of those profiles must have tested on 23andMe’s V5 chip to be eligible for the subscription.

If this sounds impractical and unethical, that is because it is. As I mentioned years ago, many genetic genealogists tested their eldest living relatives on previous versions of 23andMe to capture and analyze endangered data. Now, some of those relatives are deceased; they cannot retest on 23andMe’s V5 chip, making those profiles ineligible for 23andMe+ subscriptions. The 23andMe V5 chip has lower compatibility with other older versions of 23andMe or even current versions of AncestryDNA or Family Finder, complicating cross-platform analyses on third-party websites such as GEDmatch. V5 also delivers less precise mitochondrial DNA haplogroups than previous 23andMe chips. From a genetic genealogy perspective, these facts make the V5 chip seem less desirable. And for those who tested on older versions of 23andMe, V5 is not an upgrade. 

Ethics matter. Developing a new premium service with new premium features makes sense. But this is not that. This is revoking access to standard features that have existed since the late 2000s, diminishing their functionality, and then requiring users to endure yet another exploitative recurring revenue model all to get access to a less useful replica. That is categorically unethical. Given that 23andMe removed these features because of a data breach after placing several other standard features behind a paywall, this latest turn seems, at best, desperate, tone deaf, and extortionist.

23andMe claims that “The reintroduction of this tool isn’t just a simple ‘unlock’ of old software. We’ve rebuilt the engine using our enhanced HybridIBD™ technology.” But the value proposition does not justify the cost. And, in case you were wondering, users (regardless of their subscription status) still lack the comprehensive matching segment data download capability. 

If you want immediate access to a chromosome browser without additional fees, then transfer your 23andMe raw data files to GEDmatch. Family Tree DNA’s Family Finder and Living DNA also allow free uploads; their chromosome browsers require a one-time fee for each profile.* Ask your 23andMe matches to transfer as well.

I sympathize with the customers who invested in this technology to find family, only to lose so many matches, so much data, and so much functionality to misplaced priorities.

————————————–

*GEDmatch and Family Tree DNA allow law enforcement to practice forensic investigative genetic genealogy to identify persons of interest in criminal cases, but all users have the option to opt out of law enforcement matching. Read the terms and conditions and privacy policy of each site before taking action. Also, beware that certain forensic investigative genetic genealogy outfits, such as Othram, actively work against the terms of service of various sites, including GEDmatch, to access profiles that opted out of law enforcement matching.

Text
takahashicleaning
takahashicleaning

TEDにて

ニザール・イブラヒム:スピノサウルスを発掘するまで

(詳しくご覧になりたい場合は上記リンクからどうぞ)

体長15mの肉食恐竜スピノサウルスは、9,700万年前の川で獲物を狩っていた「太古のドラゴン」です。

古生物学者ニザール・イブラヒムと彼のチームが発見したのは、モロッコのサハラ砂漠で崖に埋まっていた新たな化石でした。

この発見によって、初めて発見された泳ぐ恐竜で、しかも肉食恐竜の中で最大だった可能性がある生物について、次第に明らかになってきたのです。

この水系には、巨大な自動車サイズのシーラカンスや怪物のようなノコギリエイがいて、上空は空飛ぶ爬虫類。翼竜で埋め尽くされていました。かなり危険な場所でしたから、タイムマシンがあっても行こうとは思わないでしょう。

こうしてわかったのは、頭部がワニに似ていることです。これはティラノサウルスなどの他の肉食恐竜とは全く異なります。一方、さらに興味深い情報が骨格の他の部分にありました。

長い骨板は大きな帆になっています。脚部の骨や頭蓋骨。そして、水かきのように幅の広い足の骨も見つかっています。

とても変わっていて、こんな足の恐竜は他にいません。普段、柔らかい堆積物の上を歩いていたか、水をかいていたのかも知れません。

骨の微細な構造や内部構造も調査したところ、とても密度が高くてコンパクトなことがわかりました。これも水中で長時間過ごす動物によく見られる特徴で水中で浮力をコントロールするのに役立ちます。

私たちは、骨を全部CTスキャンにかけて、スピノサウルスの骨格をデジタル化しました。このデジタル骨格を調べると、やはり、他のどの恐竜とも違うことに気づきました。

ティラノサウルスよりも巨大で頭蓋骨は魚を食べていたことを物語っています。さらに、骨格全体から水中に適していたことは明白です。

密度の高い骨。水かきのような足。小さな後ろ脚。これは、かなり長い時間、水中で過ごす動物の特徴なのです。

スピノサウルスを復元する過程で筋肉のつき方を調べ、皮膚で覆っていくにつれて私たちが相手にしているのが、まさに川の怪物だとわかってきました。

ティラノサウルスより巨大な肉食恐竜で、巨大生物が住む古代の川を支配し、先ほど見た様々な水生動物を捕食していたことがわかったのです。

これは本当にすごい発見です。他に類を見ない恐竜なのです。

2018年現在では、サピエンスは20万年前からアフリカで進化し、紀元前3万年に集団が形成され、氷河のまだ残るヨーロッパへ進出。紀元前2万年くらいにネアンデルタール人との生存競争に勝ち残ります。

そして、約1万2千年前のギョベクリ・テペの神殿遺跡(トルコ)から古代シュメール人の可能性もあり得るかもしれないので、今後の「T型オベリスク」など発掘作業の進展具合で判明するかもしれません。

メソポタミアのシュメール文明よりも古いことは、年代測定で確認されています。古代エジプトは、約5千年前の紀元前3000年に人類最初の王朝が誕生しています。

(個人的なアイデア)

参考として、フランスの哲学者であり啓蒙思想家のモンテスキュー。

法の原理として、三権分立論を提唱。フランス革命(立憲君主制とは異なり王様は処刑されました)の理念やアメリカ独立の思想に大きな影響を与え、現代においても、言葉の定義を決めつつも、再解釈されながら議論されています。

また、ジョン・ロックの「統治二論」を基礎において修正を加え、権力分立、法の規範、奴隷制度の廃止や市民的自由の保持などの提案もしています。現代では権力分立のアイデアは「トリレンマ」「ゲーム理論の均衡状態」に似ています。概念を数値化できるかもしれません。

権限が分離されていても、各権力を実行する人間が、同一人物であれば権力分立は意味をなさない。

そのため、権力の分離の一つの要素として兼職の禁止が挙げられるが、その他、法律上、日本ではどうなのか?権力者を縛るための日本国憲法側には書いてない。

モンテスキューの「法の精神」からのバランス上、法律側なのか不明。

立法と行政の関係においては、アメリカ型の限定的な独裁である大統領制において、相互の抑制均衡を重視し、厳格な分立をとるのに対し、イギリス、日本などの議院内閣制は、相互の協働関係を重んじるため、ゆるい権力分立にとどまる。

アメリカ型の限定的な独裁である大統領制は、立法権と行政権を厳格に独立させるもので、行政権をつかさどる大統領選挙と立法権をつかさどる議員選挙を、別々に選出する政治制度となっている。

通常の「プロトコル」の定義は、独占禁止法の優越的地位の乱用、基本的人権の尊重に深く関わってきます。

通信に特化した通信プロトコルとは違います。言葉に特化した言葉プロトコル。またの名を、言論の自由ともいわれますがこれとも異なります。科学者やエンジニアに特化したのは、サイエンスプロトコルとここでは定義します。

基本的人権がないと科学者やエンジニアはどうなるかは、歴史が証明している!独占独裁君主に口封じに形を変えつつ処刑される!確実に!これでも人権に無関係といえますか?だから、マスメディアも含めた権力者を厳しくファクトチェックし説明責任、透明性を高めて監視しないといけない。

<おすすめサイト>

リズ・ハジェック: 河川が地球の歴史について私達に語ること

シリコン生命体についてのアイデア

ジュヌヴィエーヴ・フォン・ペツィンガー:ヨーロッパ中の洞穴に描かれた32個のシンボルの謎

ユバル・ノア・ハラーリ:人類の台頭はいかにして起こったか?

ケネス・ラコバラ:恐竜の化石探しを通して知った、宇宙における人類

<提供>

東京都北区神谷の高橋クリーニングプレゼント

独自サービス展開中!服の高橋クリーニング店は職人による手仕上げ。お手頃50ですよ。往復送料、曲Song購入可。詳細は、今すぐ電話。東京都内限定。北部、東部、渋谷区周囲。地元周辺区もOKです

東京都北区神谷高橋クリーニング店Facebook版

Text
shimmerglieny
shimmerglieny

Existence is crazy cause what do you mean some random chemical strand a billion years ago got surrounded by another random chemical strand, and that made it gain consciousness?! 🤨

Text
brokenarts33833
brokenarts33833

never heard déjà vu the same again since this goddamn parody i made in head while completing MGRR story mode

Train rides, we are above

High frequency

One blade, for two

And sparring combat, laughing ‘bout my hand was slashed

(ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha)


Watching the reincarnation of RAY

Being annoying

Slicing almost everything

I bet he’s begging

To Armstrong, that you should to be recruited


So when you gonna tell him,

That we did that too?

He thinks it’s exquisite

But it’s all reused

That was our place, i found it first

I made the memes, you send to him when he’s with you


Do you get déjà vu when he’s with you, huh?

Do you get déjà vu? oh

Do you get déjà vu? ah, hmm


Do you call him,

Almost spoke my codename?

'Cause let’s be honest

We kinda looking same

Another weapon

I hate to think that i was just your rival


I bet that he knows Lorentz Force

'Cause his theme is “Stains Of Time”

You singing it together

I bet that you ever tell him

How you love him

like how i feel when i hit the chorus (oh, my dream disappear)


So when you gonna tell him,

That we did that too?

He thinks it’s exquisite

But it’s all reused

That was the sword, we talked about

Played you my theme song, he’s sing it now when he’s with you


Do you get déjà vu when he’s with you, huh?

Do you get déjà vu? oh

Do you get déjà vu? ah, hmm


Fighting brutally in Colorado

Don’t act like we didn’t do that shit too

You gave me your sword, like we used to do

(yeah, everything is all reused)

Played his sais, when he doesn’t know (oh)

That i was the one who taught you The Vamp (oh)

Different cyborg now, but there’s nothing new

(i know you get déjà vu)

Text
throughthetreesblog
throughthetreesblog

Gratitude | RootsTech 2026

I am beyond honored and humbled that FamilySearch invited me to lecture at RootsTech 2026. To the attendees who made my session, “Let The Circle Be Unbroken: How DNA Reconstructs Enslaved Families,” a memorable moment, thank you for sharing your stories, your questions, and your dedication to repairing ruptured narratives, giving voice to those silenced by archives, and supplying dimension and nuance to characters that history had flattened. As we travel the long winding road, bobbing and weaving between documentary research and genetic analysis, never lose sight of our destination: discovery.

Text
pixegias
pixegias

DNA and Protein Tools for AI-Driven Biologics Design

Scientists are increasingly applying artificial intelligence (AI) to biologics discovery, including de novo protein design. However, complex sequence-function relationships and the need for high-quality, purpose-built datasets can limit the reliability of AI predictions. Iterative design–test–learn workflows that integrate DNA synthesis, experimental characterization, and model refinement help…

Text
thewaysoundtravels
thewaysoundtravels

(Suzanne Vega, DNA - Tom’s Diner)

That beat, still sounds solid all these years later. Without it, I think Vega’s career would not have been catapulted into the big leagues like it did. She owes DNA a lot, though I imagine the success also helped their careers too. Good on her for not blocking their original unauthorized remix of her initial folk track.

Text
lenbryant
lenbryant

It’s in your cells.

Text
dr-afsaeed
dr-afsaeed

Scientists Discover DNA “Flips” That Supercharge Evolution - Science News

In Lake Malawi, hundreds of species of cichlid fish have evolved with astonishing speed, offering scientists a rare opportunity to study how biodiversity arises. Researchers have identified segments of “flipped” DNA that may allow fish to adapt rapidly to new environments and eventually form new species. These unusual genetic changes appear to function as evolutionary […]

Read more about this…


View On WordPress

Text
jillydillypickles
jillydillypickles

Overview of genetic adaptations to natural threats: climate, disease, etc.

How it differed in different populations.

‘For entertainment purposes.’ As always, please do your own research, and make your own conclusions.

Text
wordswhisperinthedark
wordswhisperinthedark

First Eijun & now Furuya?! Japan using the Daiya kiddos for the World Baseball Classic we love to see it 😌

Text
dilly-doux
dilly-doux

Mind you, this is the unsupervised analysis, not the Deep Ancestry periodical breakdown, but they referenced Norsemen in Ireland because there were Vikings were in Ireland too.

Text
dilly-doux
dilly-doux

It’s true, the Vikings did not wear those ridiculous opera helmets.

Deep Ancestry results for Middle Ages (most recent): The top results are these Germanic tribes. Sealand is in England (8 mile distance), where the Scandinavian Vikings had a presence as well as Funen in Denmark. What wasn’t seen on my middle age results was Norway, but my dad’s results also showed Norway. That’s a cool way to sum up my Northern European ancestry and how Scandinavian DNA and British DNA can overlap despite being categorized separately on DNA tests. So some DNA test algorithms may not know how to categorize Northern European ancestry especially when we’re dealing with Northern Germanic tribes. On one previous test I took, I had high “Northwestern European” DNA and seemingly low “Scandinavian DNA” but it’s actually absurd because those are both the same region. It’s silly to separate Scandinavia from Northwestern Europe in that way, because then I will have a bunch of positive samples from Nordic Vikings in Sweden or even Iceland despite this apparent paucity of Scandinavian heritage according to the results. Again, this is because Nordic regions like Sweden ARE in Northwestern Europe. Scandinavia is Northwestern Europe. It’s silly to separate “Northwest European” and “Scandinavian” into different categories. “North Sea” and “North Atlantic” are also similar genetic categories that overlap. So not all DNA tests are perfect and infallible in this regard, even the popular ones which try to incorporate familial records (all of which we may not always have access to) to replace the burden of deeper genetic study that requires in-depth consideration of complexity and nuance, especially concerning varied historical periods. Plus, a lot of migrational patterns were simply not recorded in history. So some tests rely more on records accompanied by generally modern but limited (not ancient) DNA analyses like ancestry.com to contribute to their percentages. Also, some tests go back only 500 years, and others go back to 1000-2000 years. That’s also another reason why results shift. They may want to cut off a few centuries. On some of mine, they would update and change the results constantly adding Scandinavian ancestry generously before suddenly omitting the results, and adding them back again, and it’s due to the fact that “English” and “Danish” or “Swedish” are all similar Northern European ancestries that genetically overlap with each other. There were even Vikings in Ireland. That’s partly why measuring DNA is so hard. Not to mention, migrations are complex, and identities like “English” or “French” are actually a genetic combination of different tribes/groups that migrated to these regions, and the Vikings are one of those groups. Anyway, I know I have Nordic ancestry. My nordic ancestry is extremely evident in my physical appearance. I don’t have swarthy features at all, I have very light features. Plus, I’m a strawberry blonde which is a type of redhead genetically, and that’s why I can’t tan. You could go to parts of the UK and Sweden to find a huge amount of men who look like me.

👆These admixture results above are from Gedmatch’s Eurozone K13. I think they make sense when you compare this admixture to my ancient DNA results from the Middle Ages which is displayed above. Someone could be from Norway or Denmark and see results like “North Swedish” because you could say that they’re almost ethnically the same people despite having different nationalities. So “North Swedish” is a blanket-term for Nordic. The frequency of that result could represent Viking expansion in Northern Europe. The left side of the picture is the most dominant portion of my DNA, and the right side is the second most dominate portion of my DNA. Each side are like two pieces that incorporate my genetic makeup. Some DNA test algorithms like MyTrueAncestry may be assisted by Gedmatch’s tools given that they mention it in their Admixture option. People have pointed out that MyTrueAncestry’s algorithm seems to only incorporate one DNA portion instead of both DNA portions. So they might be unintentionally excluding or limiting the results from the second portion of user DNA. Other MyTrueAncestry users mentioned that too with how uniform their personal results are. It’s important to keep that in mind if you wanna know your genetic background for say, spiritual reasons like ancestral veneration, because they may not be including the other results due to their algorithm. So that’s why their results differ from these DNA tests which incorporate it all. Notice with Gedmatch how North Swedish and Southwest English appear on both sides of both rows with a genetic proximity range of 2-3 that you see on the far right.

Brythonic (Insular) Celts are accounted for in my ancient Iron Age results at nearly 50 percent. That makes sense given that my paternal great grandparents were Welsh, and they spoke Welsh. My first and last name are also both Welsh. Mind you, Wales is not far from Southwest England which is shown on Gedmatch. So you could be Welsh and see “Southwest English” on your results. They’re probably very genetically similar if not the same in some instances even though there is historical controversy of their relations with one another.

My Ancient Antiquity results are the penultimate results, or the second most recent results after the Middle Ages.