#DSM

20 posts loaded — scroll for more

Text
jennywritespdx
jennywritespdx

By Jenny Westberg

This article may not be suitable for children.

In December 1973, a psychiatric breakthrough wiped out all signs and symptoms of mental illness for millions of Americans.

It wasn’t a new drug. It was an ex cathedra pronouncement by the American Psychiatric Association, declaring that homosexuality was not, in fact, a mental disorder.

The change meant that more than 100,000 Oregonians went to bed one night with a diagnosable psychiatric problem and woke up the next morning with none at all.

Thirty-seven years later, however, being transgender — nothing more — was still enough for a psychiatric diagnosis, with a seven-page listing in the official diagnostic manual, the DSM-IV. Clinically, it was called Gender Identity Disorder (GID).

GID was a gateway requirement for surgical transition. That means some people have little choice; like it or not, they have to submit to a psychiatric diagnosis that identifies them as “disordered.”

There are all sorts of reasons to get rid of GID. It lacks clinical sufficiency. It supports the idea that transgender persons are “sick” or “weird.” It treats distress as a psychiatric symptom, even when it’s due to discrimination and harassment.

At the same time, there are people who really need surgery, and removing GID from the DSM-IV could add to their difficulties. Portland therapist Reid Vanderburgh, MA, says it can be hard to object. “Most people bite the bullet and accept a GID diagnosis,” he says. “The desire for surgery trumps any activist instinct they might have to fight back and NOT accept it.”

But Vanderburgh, who has transitioned himself, manages to avoid the term “GID” in clinical practice.

“I don’t include GID in my referral letters, for either hormones or surgery,” he says. “I find that my letters are accepted.”

“This leads me to question the actual usefulness of the diagnosis,” says Vanderburgh. “Is GID really necessary at all?”

Resources (some links/phone numbers may have changed)

Reid Vanderburgh, MA, LMFT, 503-341-7001; www.transtherapist.com

Julie Trana, MS, 503-330-5312; www.julietrana.com

Sexual Minority Provider Alliance; http://www.glbtcounseling.com/directory.html

Oregon State University LGBTQ, “I might be transgender…”; http://oregonstate.edu/lgbtqqia/question6

HealthCommunities.com; http://lgbthealth.healthcommunities.com/transgender/index.shtml

Jenny Westberg is a board member of The Mental Health Association of Portland, a nonprofit advisory organization that supports advocacy efforts on issues around mental health. Information about their work is available at the Oregon Archive.

©Jenny Westberg. Author’s permission required to use the above. Include copyright information. The above is part of my original article.

😮

Text
coloursteelsexappeal
coloursteelsexappeal

1993 Plymouth Laser RS

Text
everybadthing
everybadthing

Ideation plan action

When to worry when we wish

We were dead

When not to worry

When it’s ocd thoughts

In our head

Never mind it never mind

Make it make sense it will not

Pass on by don’t look to closely

Don’t stop too long in thinking ruts


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70000

Text
mybuddyjimmy
mybuddyjimmy

Episode 98 - Cutting Through the Noise: Ryan Doser’s No-Nonsense Approach to AI - The Daily Plan-it 02182026

Text
bipolarmoss
bipolarmoss

LETS GOOO

Text
princess-bertha-prince-bertram
princess-bertha-prince-bertram

Throwback to the DSMII when you could dodge a pedophile diagnosis as long as no woman will help you out.

Text
zeinfamouscheerio
zeinfamouscheerio

Trophy GTR

Text
mybuddyjimmy
mybuddyjimmy

Episode 97 - From the Tuel Shed to the App Store: A Journey of Fitness, Faith, and Survival with Javier Tuel - The Daily Plan-it 020242026

Text
everydayesterday
everydayesterday

Psychiatrists plan to overhaul the mental health bible—and change how we define ‘disorder’

From Scientific American


The American Psychiatric Association has announced big upcoming changes to psychiatry’s big book of mental disorders, the DSM

Text
robinmarie12
robinmarie12

Old post when I was as in graduate school.

Text
neuroscotian
neuroscotian

“There’s a strong recognition that there were not enough voices included in our prior iterations of this document,” says Dr. Tami Benton, who leads child and adolescent psychiatry at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and is a member of the DSM strategic committee. “There’s going to have to be greater inclusion of individuals who are affected — people with lived experience, including adolescents and their families and children and their families.”

Hope it’s in a meaningful way.

Link
drag-tween
drag-tween

It's the foundation of psychiatric diagnosis. And it's about to get a makeover

It's the foundation of psychiatric diagnosis. And it's about to get a makeover
www.npr.org
Text
embervoices
embervoices

I am unpacking thoughts prompted by this post.

“The external-focused diagnostics is a problem with every single psychiatric criteria.”

That external focus is what comes from trying to make a medical science out of something grounded in personal experience. A lot of how psychology functions as a science is about making very nebulous things more concrete by focusing on external signs, i.e. behaviors.

The DSM is a Diagnostics and Statistics Manual, not a Patient Care and Treatment manual. It’s designed primarily to systematize information for the sake of bureaucracy. Each edition gets a little softer on that, and much debate goes into what kinds of symptoms are truly observable, and what kinds of symptoms should even be considered in the first place, given the cultural norms involved, but the original purpose of the DSM remains bureaucratic, not therapeutic.

So that results in diagnostic criteria aimed at trained clinicians to determine via observation if the symptoms apply, not for patients to self-evaluate. The idea is that observable behavior from the outside is more reliable because every patient is bound to have different ideas what the questions mean, and be severely biased about themselves regardless of their intentions, whereas the training for clinicians is supposed to help them be more consistent and objective in their observations, but they only have access to what is visible from the outside.

It’s effectively misused, especially because of how the US medical system handles insurance coverage. Not quite as bad as how BMI gets used, but a similar problem solved a similar way, with better attention to detail, but not significantly better attention to therapeutic outcomes, because that’s not the goal in the first place.

I’m not saying this is good, or that we should like it more, I just think it helps to understand the context of what we’re looking at.

Text
wii-play-motion
wii-play-motion

is maga republican in the DSM-5

Text
gryficowa
gryficowa

DSM is strange… On the one hand, you have disorders and real mental illnesses, and then there is left-handedness, homosexuality/asexuality, and in the past there was also a case of black people running away from their owners…

Seriously, why do people find this shit credible and use it to attack asexual people these days?

Seriously, don’t you remember the black people who were suddenly mentally ill because they were running away from their “White masters”?

Don’t you remember being fucking left-handed? How can you take this shit for granted as a reliable source?

I hate that even many queer people use this as an argument for why we need to “Cure” asexual people and wish many of us could be cured with conversion therapy

Yes, literally queer people who were victims of this shit want asexual people to be tortured and forced to have sex… You know how gay people were forced to be straight…

You’re becoming the shit you were fucking fighting against

Text
g00melo5-art-blog
g00melo5-art-blog
Text
fuckdup4evr
fuckdup4evr

When your cousin is a therapist and she hands you the DSM so you read about BPD and learn why and where the feelings and behaviors that’re ruining your life, come from…

Almost started crying reading it

Text
majinz3yang
majinz3yang

ʚTurboAngelɞ

Text
mybuddyjimmy
mybuddyjimmy

The Tenderloin Takedown

A Jimmy Olsen Mystery from the AI mind of Jimmy Olsen

I have always believed that a city reveals its secrets through its food.

New York has bagels. Chicago has deep-dish pizza that doubles as structural engineering. Des Moines—my fair, occasionally baffling hometown—has the pork tenderloin sandwich. Not a dainty one, mind you. An Iowa tenderloin is less “sandwich” and more “state fair dare,” a…

Text
mybuddyjimmy
mybuddyjimmy

Seeing the Future Before It Happens: Why Personal & Professional Vision Matters