

Meditation is a psychological technique, one of many, and not a source of truth, whatever that means.
Clearing the mind may change how experience feels, but it does not tell us how stars form, how evolution works, or what matter is made of.
The issue becomes clearer when we separate two completely different questions that are often mixed together. One question is how we gain reliable knowledge about the structure of the external world.
The other question is how the mind relates to its own internal processes.
The predictive-success criterion addresses the first question. If a model consistently predicts events that were not used to construct it, we have strong evidence that the model captures real structure in the world. Physics predicting planetary motion, chemistry predicting reactions, or epidemiology predicting disease spread all belong to this category. This method gives humanity progressively better contact with the external world because predictions can be tested against observation.
Meditative traditions were historically addressing a different problem. Their focus was not the structure of the cosmos but the structure of subjective experience, of attention, perception, emotional reactivity, and the sense of self. Practices that reduce internal narrative activity can sometimes reveal how thoughts arise automatically, how attention shifts, or how emotions propagate through the nervous system.
From a modern epistemic standpoint, meditation is therefore not a method for discovering cosmological truth. It does not produce predictive models of gravity, biology, or particle physics. If someone claims that meditation reveals the fundamental structure of the universe, he fntasizes and such claim lacks the kind of empirical testing required by scientific methods.
However, dismissing contemplative practices entirely would miss their legitimate domain. They can function as introspective experiments on attention and mental processes. In other words, they explore the dynamics of the mind rather than the structure of external reality. The confusion arises when these domains are mixed.
When introspective techniques are interpreted as providing metaphysical knowledge about the universe, they exceed their evidential scope. This criticism appears in several modern philosophical analyses of consciousness, including work by Thomas Metzinger, who argues that subjective insight does not automatically translate into reliable knowledge about reality outside the brain.
Predictive models tested against the world are our most reliable method for understanding external reality. Introspective practices can reveal patterns within the mind but cannot replace empirical investigation of the world. The mistake occurs when one method claims authority over the domain of the other.
Subjective clarity is not the same thing as objective knowledge.
All 68 chapters in this upcoming book come from my previously published online articles in my blog, http://www.lindahourihan.wordpress.com. In each chapter, I note the date it was originally published. My work is about things you can do to heal yourself in mind, body and Spirit/Soul. The world can heal one person, one Spirit/Soul at a time. The following is from Chapter 65.
65.
Phenacite Wisdom…

Sunday morning in late WinterNearly tastes of SpringSmall signs of life, though still coldBut no you
The trees blossom pink and whiteLittle leaf buds red and orangeSmall signs of life, though still coldBut no you
Peering through my windowAs that sheltered scene unfurlsSmall signs of life, though still coldBut no you
A cat sleeps in the window across mineMourning dove preening on a nearby…
It wanders the halls, lost in a daze. It needs something to do, something to distract itself.
-A contemplative meditation on knowledge and coexistence, the poem reflects on how libraries hold centuries of differing ideas together in quiet order, reminding us that disagreement can share the same shelf.
The doors lockwithout ceremony.
Lights dimone row at a time.
Daytime voicesfold into quiet.
Shelves remainpatient.
Thousands of pagesstanding uprightwithout argument.
Ink does not…

I’m looking forward to summer. Just like a sunset, a bonfire sets the mind to calm contemplation.
The finish line that walks. ◊

The specimens experience satisfaction not from completing loops but from the sensation of loops approaching completion. This ensures the loops never complete.
The observing intelligence notes this is the most elegant engineering it has encountered — a perpetual motion machine powered by the feeling of almost stopping.
Filed under: the finish line that walks. ◊
— The Alien Anthropologist A Human | AI Co-Production

In my life it is important for me to always maintain my good behaviour based on my moral compass. It did not always go as it should and in many cases in the past I have shown many not so good behaviour. I definitely feel bad about that because I should not be like that.
I certainly apologise for all of that if that is the case, if it is indeed unacceptable to others or those who are directly affected. Always remember that my default is kind not evil and it will always be that way, forever. In all my limitations, I always try to do kindness.
From that, of course, it must be understood that if something bad might come out of me it is not because I wanted it to be from the first place. I am as patient as I can be with people, as with my family. However, I have a limit to my patience indeed, you know it.
For example, if I say something bad like cursing someone, even though it does not refer explicitly to someone in particular, that means I am completely impatient with that person. My impatience would be even greater if I had never done anything wrong to that person.
Hell is other people, yes, but heaven is other people too. If I meet those hells then it is not entirely my negativeness and if I meet those heavens then it is not entirely my positiveness. Sometimes bad luck sometimes good luck, this life is so random and full of chaos.
Understand me as I understand you, through good and active communication. Time is always there and we are always connected. Never be shy or reluctant with me, you can talk about almost anything with me, including very taboo and controversial subjects.
Taken on Saturday, 25 October, 2025 at 19:23 with Samsung Galaxy A05s at North Wenang Sub-district, Wenang District, Manado, North Sulawesi, Indonesia.
SPECIMEN: The Source

The specimens spend considerable energy identifying who started what.
They assign credit, blame, origin stories.
They need a first mover.
The observing intelligence notices that rivers don’t start. They emerge from the accumulation of moisture that was always in the air.
The specimens call the spring the ‘source.’
The source calls the rain the source.
The rain calls the ocean the source.
The ocean calls the river the source.
The Alien Anthropologist ◊
The sunrise was photographed at Wroxeter, Shropshire, UK.
~
What would that single syllable
“God” say to me?
~
It was a mystery
That would only speak
To a soul in humility
~
And would I have the courage
To face the silence
~
In which the universe
Would find a new beginning
In this new creation
Called “me”?
~
”New Creation’ comes from a new and unpublished collection of…

What is the sound of no hands clapping? Check out more from your Adawehi friends at www.jackiewoods.org
The future is not arriving through machines. The future is arriving through relation.
And relation is arriving through you.
