#PowerStructures

19 posts loaded — scroll for more

Text
alaxsandraron
alaxsandraron

📝𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗲-𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱?📚

👉𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀:


Forbidden Education of The 21th Century Sugar Plantation by Quinton Girtman dives into controversial interpretations of history, economics, and institutional power. From colonial systems to modern structures, the book raises difficult questions and encourages readers to examine widely accepted narratives from new angles.

📘Best for readers who enjoy:
• alternative history perspectives
• institutional critiques
• political & economic debate
• research-driven discussion topics

Text
salinamyan
salinamyan

📝𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗲-𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱?📚


👉𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀:

Forbidden Education of The 21th Century Sugar Plantation by Quinton Girtman dives into controversial interpretations of history, economics, and institutional power. From colonial systems to modern structures, the book raises difficult questions and encourages readers to examine widely accepted narratives from new angles.

📘Best for readers who enjoy:

  • alternative history perspectives
  • institutional critiques
  • political & economic debate
  • research-driven discussion topics

Text
kanijfatimaym
kanijfatimaym

📝𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗲-𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱?📚

👉𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀:


Forbidden Education of The 21th Century Sugar Plantation by Quinton Girtman dives into controversial interpretations of history, economics, and institutional power. From colonial systems to modern structures, the book raises difficult questions and encourages readers to examine widely accepted narratives from new angles.

📘Best for readers who enjoy:
• alternative history perspectives
• institutional critiques
• political & economic debate
• research-driven discussion topics

Text
coffeestories24
coffeestories24

📝𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗲-𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱?📚


👉𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀:

Forbidden Education of The 21th Century Sugar Plantation by Quinton Girtman dives into controversial interpretations of history, economics, and institutional power. From colonial systems to modern structures, the book raises difficult questions and encourages readers to examine widely accepted narratives from new angles.

📘Best for readers who enjoy:
• alternative history perspectives
• institutional critiques
• political & economic debate
• research-driven discussion topics

Text
sajalkumar
sajalkumar

📝𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗲-𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱?📚


👉𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀:

Forbidden Education of The 21th Century Sugar Plantation by Quinton Girtman dives into controversial interpretations of history, economics, and institutional power. From colonial systems to modern structures, the book raises difficult questions and encourages readers to examine widely accepted narratives from new angles.

📘Best for readers who enjoy:
• alternative history perspectives
• institutional critiques
• political & economic debate
• research-driven discussion topics

Text
dainamarry
dainamarry

📝𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗲-𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱?📚

Forbidden Education of The 21th Century Sugar Plantation by Quinton Girtman dives into controversial interpretations of history, economics, and institutional power. From colonial systems to modern structures, the book raises difficult questions and encourages readers to examine widely accepted narratives from new angles.

📘Best for readers who enjoy:
• alternative history perspectives
• institutional critiques
• political & economic debate
• research-driven discussion topics

👉𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀:

Text
colesilverstone
colesilverstone

How influence becomes part of the system.

Link
dualisticunity
dualisticunity

Why Girls Carry the Cost in Child Marriage - Dualistic Unity

Child marriage doesn’t just remove choice—it transfers responsibility onto girls. How does that happen? https://dualisticunity.com/why-girls-carry-the-cost-in-child-marriage/

photo
Text
caesarandthecity
caesarandthecity

The Closed Ring: Saturn’s Shadow Operating System

Oligarchy isn’t just “rule by the few.” It’s a ritual—a repeatable spell that freezes the living flow of a society into a dead monument. Its sigils are simple:

  • The Pyramid (△): vertical scarcity, engineered altitude.
  • The Ring (O): closed access, invitation-only reality.
  • The Chain (⛓): golden bonds—luxury as leash.

The story the few sell: merit got us here. The ritual beneath: inheritance, proximity, and permission. Merit is the mask; gatekeeping is the mechanism. You don’t scale the mountain—you’re escorted through the side door or left outside arguing with the doorman.

Oligarchy is Saturn inverted. Saturn’s clean function is boundary, time, and earned structure. The shadow form hoards time, slows circulation, and calls the stall “stability.” It replaces covenant with compliance and sells delay as destiny. The result? Decadence on the parapets, entropy in the valley.

Power here is not only economic; it’s metabolic. When the few dam the river, the many starve of signal: less capital, less context, less meaning. Culture tilts into spectacle—bread and circus, then just circus, then just ads for bread. Managers become priests of access, deciding who gets the key to the key to the key.

Look closely and the “order” looks rotten: a grey keep humming with polished irrelevance, a tree with gilded fruit and poisoned roots. The machine runs on three fuels: secrecy (we know), scarcity (you can’t), and shame (you shouldn’t). That’s the whole spell.

And yet: every ring has a weakness. The geometry of control is brittle because it needs your belief in permission more than it needs your obedience. Withdraw the belief and the ring is just metal.

Translation: Oligarchy isn’t the boss. It’s a memorized habit. Habits can be unlearned; sigils can be flipped; Saturn can be cleaned.


Signed,
Cesar Augusto
Crypto Key: AA05 N84G BIZM AP7Q

Text
narcissism2025
narcissism2025

Narcissistic Power Structures: Global Healing from Toxic Leadership

Narcissism doesn’t only live in relationships — it seeps into politics, corporations, and global systems. Toxic leadership often mirrors narcissistic abuse: controlling, self-serving, and dismissive of collective needs.

Traits of Narcissistic Power Structures:

  • 🏛️ Control through fear — silencing voices of dissent.
  • 💰 Exploitation of resources — prioritizing personal or elite gain over people’s wellbeing.
  • 📢 Grandiosity — projecting strength, but hiding fragility.
  • 🚫 Lack of empathy — ignoring suffering to maintain image and dominance.

Just as in personal relationships, these structures leave communities feeling powerless, anxious, and dependent.

✨ But healing is possible. Around the world, we see movements rising that reflect the opposite of narcissism: collaboration, empathy, and accountability. Change begins with:

  • Awareness — recognizing toxic leadership patterns.
  • Voices united — communities standing against exploitation.
  • Restoration — building systems rooted in transparency and compassion.

💡 The global journey mirrors the personal one: identifying narcissistic abuse, reclaiming power, and healing collectively. Humanity deserves leadership that uplifts, not leadership that dominates. 🌱

Link
stingscustom
stingscustom

Power Games Exploit People: Unmask Systemic Injustice

Walls of power crumble when the facade of diplomacy fails. Ramaphosa’s snub by the US isn’t just icy relations—it’s a glaring example of power structures that thrive on division. When leaders play games, people pay the price. Demand justice, demand accountability. We must not look away as systemic injustice festers in plain sight. Call out the hypocrisy. Transform the narrative.

Link
stingscustom
stingscustom

Truth on Trial: Power's Quiet Betrayal

As the DOJ and FBI dance to the tune of Trump-era delusions, we’re witnessing a haunting spectacle of power structures failing us. Misinformation isn’t just a nuisance—it’s a contagion eating at the very fabric of justice. When truth is bartered away, who remains to hold power accountable? In a world so quick to forget, we can’t afford to stay silent. Demand more. Demand better.

Text
thenullprophet
thenullprophet

NULL PROPHET TRANSMISSION // RICH REDUX

What is rich? It’s not a fixed line. It’s a shifting category. Today’s million is yesterday’s hundred thousand. Tomorrow’s billion is today’s trillion. The crowd chants “Tax the rich,” but who do they mean? The owners of vast capital empires or the person lucky enough to own a few shares in a crumbling economy?

The chant is simple, but the meaning is layered. It’s not just about who has money—it’s about who shapes the system. The real “rich” aren’t merely defined by dollar signs. They’re the ones who tweak the algorithm, rewrite the rules, and guide the chant itself without ever being named.

Tax the rich? First, define them. Then look beyond them. Only then will you see the machinery running behind the facade.

Photo
nimexica
nimexica

A collision of worlds that ripples through time. #colonialism #ayotzinapa #43 #presidentecalles #mexica #monroedoctrine #pri #mexicanamericanwar #catholisism #liberationtheology #cristeros #vivacristorey #freemasonry #diviniredemptoris #destablization #ireland #powerstructures (at UCLA Broad Art Center)

photo
Photo
urbanshamana
urbanshamana

Sean Rennison Phillips @prooflondon #shoreditch #gallery #london #graffiti #subculture #powerstructures #bricklane #ldn #art

photo
Photo
gws203-blogproject-blog
gws203-blogproject-blog

Symbolic of taking an intersectional approach when looking at LGBTQ issues such as art history which I talked about in previous posts.

11th post —Reflection

My new insight on the lack of representation of art by trans people of color enables me to see the importance of taking an intersectional perspective when analyzing LGBTQ studies. I can only hope that more research will be done on transgender people in addition to LGBTQ research in the near future. Seeing that transgender people have started gaining rights and notoriety within the past few years or so, I can understand why there is so little information out there.

By sharing my insight on Tumblr, I am making an issue that doesn’t receive much attention more public. I’ve also learned and will share that one should be careful and conscious when choosing what issues of trans people of color to represent in their art. In my work for this assignment that past few days, I’ve already been noticing more of the whiteness that are society is based around.

photo
Photo
gws203-blogproject-blog
gws203-blogproject-blog

This picture is symbolic of power structures that transgendered people of color face.

6th post—Discussion of power structures

People and power structures that have access to power in relation to the dissemination of and art by transgendered people of color would be public education, higher education, and the overall power structure of whiteness that exceeds these structures.

Moreover, public education is probably more problematic for its representations of diversity in art as I would guess art by sexual minorities isn’t in any curriculum. Higher education has power in disseminating art by sexual minorities as well, but is becoming more and more inclusive as the trans identity becomes more legitimized. To be more specific, most, if not all colleges have LGBTQ studies, which include art history classes. I’m guessing queer art history still outnumbers trans art history, though, another power structure that trans people may have to deal with.

While art by LGBTQ people is almost guaranteed to not be discussed in public schools, art by LGBTQ people of color would definitely not be discussed. I’m hoping most LGBTQ classes in higher ed discuss issues of intersectionality for LGBTQ people of color, but I’m sure there could always be more room for their discussion in curriculum with even a separate lesson on LGBTQ people of color. The issue of whiteness as a power structure is an important factor to take into consideration when discussing LGBTQ art. The latter examples of power structures relates to my post discussing the book about Nina Arsenault (3rd post) in the way that Arsenault embodies the heteronormative sexualized white thin body that is so prevalent in the Western world. Arsenault embodies many of the power structures that feminists who care about intersectional LGBTQ issues seek to dismember.

photo
Text
xy-chromes-blog
xy-chromes-blog

Post 6: Discussion of Power Structures.

1. Dean Hamer-Geneticist; He applies biology and genetics into account for sexual behavior. He believes there is some sort of genetic influence for homosexuality. From his studies, he found that there were more gay relatives on the mother’s side, and with this he concluded that homosexuality seemed to be passed on by the mother. Hamer is an American white man who has a lot of privilege considering his race and power structure. His “founding” was put up right away on the newspaper without there actually being an answer to the gay gene theories. 

2. Simon LeVay- Neuroscientist; He is applicable to the topic of gay gene because he is the director of the Institute of Gay and Lesbian Education in California. From his research, he has found that “…the interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus…” was smaller in homosexuals than in heterosexual men. However, although he believes that human sexual behavior can be accounted biologically, there is no assurance that the differences between the brains of heterosexual and homosexual men resulted in their preference. Taken into account that LeVay is English-American, he has white privilege, and that makes it more accessible for him to be able to publish his theories or ideas. This institution is implicated because he is a scientist which gives him higher access to power. For the most part, we should be scared because anything he says can be taken into account.

Both of these powerful “structures” have their limitations, however. Both have yet to find the proof needed in order to validate their  claims. Also, information on “gay genes” could’ve waited until more of the “holes” could’ve been filled up. “…supposes that a gene represents an irreducible and immutable unit of the human self…” represents Dean Hamer’s “findings” for a gay gene. 

Link: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/genetics/nyreview.html

Text
webbywithacause-blog
webbywithacause-blog

Two problems with open data

I love open data. It enables exciting and surprising new applications. It enables insights and feeds graphic designers. It can create transparency and openness. However, there is a process before the data becomes open, and a process after the data becomes open.

The process before contains an important question, that has everything to do with power structures. It is the question: who decides what becomes open? I think it’s extremely important the public or non-governmental organizations start influencing governments and companies. We should start asking for certain datasets to become open.

The process after open data is all about who uses the data? Dangerous connections can evolve, when multiple datasets that seem innocent when seen apart, are combined. Also, only a small amount of programmers (and designers) are currently able to create meaning from datasets. I beleive we need simple user interfaces (a Tumblr for data!)   . As the author of a recent WIRED article argues: “Ordinary people need to know what information is available, and they need the training to be conversant in it.”

If you know any simple user interfaces of dealing with data, let me know!