#MSC

20 posts loaded — scroll for more

Text
rhapsodyinrebellion
rhapsodyinrebellion

I listened to a class this morning about trauma informed erotic humiliation. And, I think they made some really good points.

A) Humiliation is not a blanket term. There are several emotions that fall under the humiliation umbrella.

B) it is super important to negotiate what emotions the sub/bottom wants to experience and what they don’t want to experience in the scene. It’s a part of negotiation that often gets left behind, but with humiliation, it’s super important.

C) Whatever acts are happening in the scene really are colored by the emotions the sub/bottom wants to experience. An example they used was piss play. If someone wants to feel owned, soaking their clothes and teasing them about how everyone will know they belong to you because you’ve marked your territory, or having them drink it and playing on the “now you have some of me inside of you” aspect could work. If they want to feel broken… you may throw them to the ground and piss on them while standing over them, while being quite a bit more harsh with your language.

D) Everyone has different risk profiles! So it is _super_ important to actually know yourself and your risk profile, because there is a lot of potential for real life harm with humiliation. An example is… personally, I will not play with any humiliation that is connected to a real core insecurity. It’s outside of my risk profile, it’s something that will stick with me for a long time and affect my day to day life. But things that aren’t related to my deep insecurities would be fair game. I like feeling a little embarassed. And don’t like feeling like I’ve failed in some way.

E) REMEMEBER THAT DOMS/TOPS HAVE LIMITS TOO! One of the presenters is a sex worker from another country, and he mentioned that he had a client who wanted to be humiliated because all of his relationships failed, and his girlfriend had just left him. And the Top said they weren’t comfortable with that scene. It was outside their risk profile and the potential for actual harm was too great.

F) It’s a really subjective kink. What’s humiliating for one person won’t be for someone else. It can also vary based on the day! One of the presenters is super into dumbification. And most of the time it’s a steady turn on for them. But one day, he failed at test at school when he’d had a dumbification scene arranged for that night, and, they had to shift. It didn’t feel safe that day, due to circumstances, even tho it’s a major kink for them typically. That’s why check-ins, even within a 24/7 dynamic are important.

G) High Risk/High reward does not work out for most people. You can have your own risk profile, but also keep that in mind. If you choose to play with really risky, close to the heart things, your risk of either getting very hurt or really damaging someone else increases exponentially.

H) Emotional aftercare is important especially for mitigating risk. Reassuring someone after, cuddling, making sure they know it was just play, etc, can definitely help with mitigating risk. And the aftercare is likely to be more than just the immediate moment after a session. It could be days of reassurance, depending on what came up and how it affected them. One of the presenters mentioned that a D-type had tried to humiliate them by saying they talked too much. But it seriously stuck with him, for weeks, and sometimes still comes up as a fear of being annoying for talking too much. If you’re gonna play with someone you an emotionally sadistic way, you have to be able to reassure them after the fact, and potentially much longer than you anticipate if it hit a deep chord within them. Remember aftercare is about helping get someone back to ground zero after a scene, if you do the damage, you help them heal from it. 🫶

Text
allphatbat
allphatbat
Text
nightmares0nedge
nightmares0nedge
Text
bunekadepano
bunekadepano

Navio MSC Orchestra: minha experiência 2025

Embarquei no MSC Orchestra dia 19/01/2025 .
O MSC Orchestra é minha segunda viagem de navio. A primeira foi em 2020, podem conferir a viagem aqui: Navio Soberano. E percebi muita diferença, não apenas do tamanho do navio e empresa, mas do embarque também.

Vamos do início?

Como a data de embarque estava marcada para às e, pensando na última experiência, que ficamos um século para entrar,…

Text
pansy2025
pansy2025

exclusive footage of missouri surf club playing a new song at the crack fox last nite!!!

Text
voyagefoxblog
voyagefoxblog

Escaping the cold and exploring the world? YES PLEASE 💙 Set sail with MSC Cruises and discover the sunshine, skyline, and luxury vibes of Dubai. The perfect winter getaway starts at sea.

Plan your next cruise: https://voyagefox.net/

#MSCCruises #MSC #CruiseLife #Dubai #DubaiTravel #WinterEscape #LuxuryTravel #TravelInspiration #CruiseVacation

Text
rhapsodyinrebellion
rhapsodyinrebellion

Ok! Sorry this is so long overdue. My notes on the “How to Make M/s Relationships Last”! It is super long, there was just so much good information in there, I didn’t want to miss any of it!!!


The presenter calls it the STERA Method.

S-Structure and Ritual

T- Trust

E - Evolve

R - Resilience

A - Authenticity

Structure and Ritual

This is kind of the part that makes it feel like a dynamic. Not just in scenes or sex but in everyday life. It’s what makes the Master feel like a Master and the slave feel like a slave.

It can be anything from a mantra to honorifics, to a collar or clothes to rules. And, he cautions that it’s tempting to set up a lot of it, but, everytime you add a new element of structure, you run the risk of it becoming too much to maintain, for either the Master or the slave. And the relationships who seem to last the longest happily, are the relationships who find and navigate that balance.


The M/s dynamics that seem to last the longest happily, do not require micro management, typically. It may take some work to set up the structure and a little time for it to flow, but it shouldn’t need to be micromanaged by the Master. It needs some flexibility. Dynamics that utilize smaller rituals and routines more often than major performative rituals often last long and more successfully integrate M/s into their every day. It’s building structure into your life in a way that just flows, with little effort to maintain.


Different parts of structure may mean more to the M or the s. In one couple he’d interviewed, there were several parts of the structure that meant the world to the slave, but weren’t nearly as important or meaningful for the Master. But they’ve been together 20years, because the Master understands how important those things are to his slave.


And the relationships where something like that is happening and the Master (or slave if the opposite occurred) doesn’t understand the importance of something to their partner, are the relationships that are more likely to end or transition to something more vanilla.


What’s important is both parties communicating and working to build a structure that meets both people’s needs. It’s finding the compromises that work.


Structure is the container that lets the dynamic work. It’s what allows it to grow.



Trust (2 parts - responsibility/follow through, and consistency)


The more that the slave gives over to the Master, the more responsibility the Master must take. But sometimes a Master may not want to take responsibility for the impact that their control has on the slaves life, and that is not sustainable. He speaks a bit about his personal experience, as he has been in both roles in 24/7 dynamics. He said it was extremely difficult to have a Master who wanted full control, but then when he, the slave, had real world issues, the Master went “Well, that’s your problem to sort out.” It’s simply not a way to have a sustainable long term relationship or dynamic.


Masters who are more in their shadow are more likely to blame the slave when things go wrong, rather than to take that responsibility themselves as well. They want the power but push away from the responsibility, because a part of that responsibility is taking accountability when things go wrong.


“I learned the hard way that if I did not follow through, trust is broken.” - An English Leather Master


And there is a misconception that the slave can let go completely and it all falls to the Master, and, that’s not true either. The slave does bear responsibility to the relationship, vis verbalizing needs, wants, feelings, issues they’re having, making suggestions. Actively trying to solve things and trying to understand what needs to happen for the relationship to succeed.


The structure (the first pillar) works because _both_ sides take responsibility for their roles in it. Even when life gets busy and hectic. Especially when life is busy and hectic. That structure anchors the relationship, and reassures.


Trust is built in small steps. Did you do what you said you’d do.


Some masters will agree to do something and then wait for the slave to give up on it. And that’s not good.


One of the biggest disappointments from slaves that has been shared with him repeatedly, is if the slave find out that the master doesn’t really seem to care about their structure/protocol. That they don’t care if something doesn’t get done, they don’t hold the slave accountable to their agreement. It causes a massive sense of grief and sadness in the submissive.


It’s a part of why the structure has to be maintainable. Because the Master has to maintain consistency when/ if the slave becomes lax. The responsibility falls to both, but in this case, it is the masters responsibility to keep the slave accountable to their structure. When setting structure, it’s helpful to think “would I want to do this even if I had a bad day at work.”


Both need to turn up and be vulnerable in the dynamic. A lot of Masters don’t want to be vulnerable with their slave, and the result is that it limits the depth of the relationship. It forces a dead end where the relationship just can’t go much deeper.


He shared a personal experience where he told his slave that he was experiencing burnout and was about to go to a burn out retreat. After the retreat he asked his slave if they’d be interested in starting to date. And the fact the slave was willing to try to build something when he was at his most vulnerable, helped establish an immense amount of trust between them.

He said sometimes when they play, he gets emotional and finds tears, because he can open his heart up so much with his slave.


“It’s not about big gestures, it’s about turning up every day”



Evolve


This means that the relationship needs to be able to evolve along with other life circumstances. It means potentially using less ritual while maintaining the meaning or potentially the opposite where you both have the time and space and as your relationship deepens, there’s more ritual.


The presenter mentioned how he just moved from Berlin to the UK, and that there was a family emergency with his father. And their relationship has had to evolve to accommodate for those circumstances. As he needs to spend more time with his father, he has less time available to maintain all of the structure of their relationship. They still make a point to have rituals of meaning, but some parts of their structure have had to shift.


The relationship will evolve on its own as well.


The presenter talked about how there were really three entities in the relationship. There’s the master, the slave, and the power exchange itself. And that it is important to pay attention to the power exchange and to prune it as necessary. To pay attention when a new branch appears. And to guide its growth in a direction that the two people involved both desire.


The first person he interviewed, had been with their slave for over 30 years. And the quotation was “We’ve had to change a lot, but the foundation remains the same.”

They became experts at evaluating how to adjust when life popped up. At being more intense when time and energy allowed, and dialing it back when there were health concerns or period of immense stress.


They suggested that check-ins can help. Yearly/monthly, etc.


Resilience


Can be jealousy, anger, hurt.


Willingness to pause reflect and repair when necessary.


An example was a dynamic that had a very strong control element. But after 6 years it failed. Because the slaves father died, and he was so grief stricken that he could not serve the Master the way the Master wanted.

And, although someone outside the relationship dying wouldn’t end a vanilla relationship, the presenter sees it very frequently in power exchange dynamics.


He attributes this to… sometimes the structure is so strong and tight, that it’s actually brittle.


It’s why it is important for the structure to be adaptable, so that it is resilient. So that when big things hit it, it bends, but doesn’t snap.


He said he believes some of it is tied to a term from Jungian psychology: Pure Eternus / Don Juanism. They’re the archetype of people that get caught up in the fantasy. The people that want to float above and not be weighed down by other’s problems. And when reality comes up, they almost want to disconnect, to keep the fantasy “pure”.


But to make a power exchange relationship last, you need to set that aside. You need to do the boring, day by day work to keep the relationship going.


Tools and communication, emotional intelligence to hear and understand each other.


The one thing that came up over and over again was the importance of communication. And not just communicating, but understanding what your partner is saying, and really integrating it.


Especially when people are new, they may believe the myth that the dominant does the talking and deciding, and that there isn’t room for the submissive to give input into the structure and way that things are done. Or that the Master can always disagree, and override what the slave says. But really, both sides need to come together.


The structure needs to allow for the slave to bring things up to the Master that aren’t working for them. It is what allows the relationship to become.


The presenter said in one of the relationships with the strictest protocol that he interviewed, they used “porch time”. Here on tumblr they’re called “meta talks”. Times when you step outside the dynamic to have those conversations.

It can be used to express wants and needs. But also to air grievances, hurt, pain.

The hardest part, is that the Dominant _has_ to put their ego aside to hear what the submissive has to say. Even when it is painful.

Which, the presenter shared, is easy to say but extremely hard to do. Because there is nothing worse to a Dominant than hearing that they messed up. But in a relationship that’s going to last, the D-type must have the maturity to listen, and take that responsibility when necessary.

And, it goes the other way as well, the submissive has to have the maturity to hear that they may have an issue. The slave has to be willing to hear the Master’s needs and why things may need to change within the relationship.


If either side cannot do that, it’s very hard for the relationship to survive. And sadly, there are a lot of people out there who haven’t or won’t do the inner work that’s needed to heal and move on/repair after conflict.


“You have the say the hard things, even when it’s awkward. Hiding stuff erodes trust faster than an honest conversation ever could.”


Some are able to keep the dynamic active during the conversations, there may not need to be a specific “porch time” or “meta talk”, but it depends on the dynamic. Stricter dynamics with more intense structure will likely need the “meta talk”.


He did give an example of a couple he has interviewed, who, during those conversations the slave would sit at the Master’s feet, and when the hard conversations got too intense, he would bow his head to the floor, to remember where he is and his role before going back into the hard conversation.


So there is no right or wrong. Some need to come out of the role and dynamic, others can stay inside of it. It’s choosing a structure that will work is good for the both of you, and the relationship. What’s vital is this you have the communication so you can ensure the resiliency of the relationship, and make it last.


“Challenges in an M/s relationship are inevitable. The maturity is in how you respond.” That’s how you keep the resiliency.


Authenticity


Your “way” and your “why”. Finding the deeper purpose of the relationship, or the role you have. It’s also permission to ditch the blueprint and adapt to what works for you.


The purpose is the “why”, it’s important for both M and s to explore and find the reason they want to continue doing these things. The slave may ask “why do I continue to not use the sofa? Why do I continue to do the things the Dominant has asked of me?” The dominant may ask “Why do I continue to take responsibility for these things when it’s hard?” The purpose, your “why” is what keeps you going.


It also comes into play further into the lasting relationship. When what started as excitement and newness turns into the monotone of regular life.


Finding the intrinsic purpose that allows you to go on. It’s how people survive intense adversity as well. He mentioned a book written by a concentration camp survivor, where he talked about how his intrinsic purpose gave him enough strength to survive. He developed it into a kind of logo therapy to help others.


Purpose = reframing the joy, the suffering, the boredom. All of the things that can be apart of a power exchange relationship. The reason we choose to live this way.


He talks about a power exchange family where the Master said to him “we’re normaling, and I don’t know if that’s a good thing or not” and he had to explore with them about what needed change, or not.


“Purpose is the anchor for everything else in the relationship.”


If structure is the soil, environment, sunlight. Purpose is the deep roots.


Master/slave, BDSM, Fetish, Power exchange are all often gateways to move us from our ego into our true selves. To our souls, to our needs, and desires that may be very different from what the rest of the world wants us to do.


By reflecting and understanding why you want the relationship, why you need the things you do, you can allow the relationship to evolve over time. Sometimes an identity change over time allows you to rediscover a new purpose for the identity you now are.


The purpose is also important to discuss and build into the structure, to make it come true for both parties.


Ditching the blueprint


He mentioned that he gets a lot of messages from people who practice M/s, who don’t necessarily plug into the actual M/s community, but see what’s online.


They worry their relationship is odd because it doesn’t seem to fit the template that they see.


It’s important to let go of the myth, the fantasy, and other blueprints, and work towards what works for _you_.


“The relationship only started to work when we dropped the act and showed up as ourselves.”


It’s a key thing in the relationship that will allow it to last.


“Our dynamic works because it’s ours, not someone else’s idea.”


Summary:


Structure: Simple structure, protocol, and total that makes it real.


Trust: consistency and responsibility builds control and a relationship that lasts


Evolve: lasting power evolves overtime through reflection and cultivation


Resilience: M/s relationships last when the Master and slave communicate well and respond to challenges.


Authenticity: discover the purpose behind what you want and let go of the stereotypical blueprints.


These pillars don’t dictate what your M/s or power exchange relationship should look like. Each relationship is unique and it’s one of the amazing things about the life style.


But the 5 pillars give it the strength to make it last, and they’re based on the knowledge of many dynamics and their accumulated knowledge.

Text
nightmares0nedge
nightmares0nedge
Text
rhapsodyinrebellion
rhapsodyinrebellion

Next up is:

Building the Team: Non-adversarial M/s. It’s gonna be long as fuck cause I loved the class.

First up, they clarified their definitions.

Adversarial approach - revolves around the concept that the slave is passive, and disobedience is expected. And that motivation for obedience, at least at first, may stem from fear of consequences.

Teamwork approach - The slave very much wants to obey. Making the relationship and power exchange work is both people’s responsibility. Maybe different status, but, shared responsibility. Slave is not passive in receiving punishment, but actively colludes with the Master to bring about the desired goals.

They make a point to really specify that neither is “right”. One way isn’t good while the other is bad, and they’ve talked to a lot of people on both sides of the fence to see why they like what they like.

Most porn examples are adversarial examples. And that works for some people, but not all of it works for all of them. And some people come into the life style without knowing much outside of how it’s done in porn, so, they are teaching the class just to show that there is another way, for those who want/need it.

They very much take the view point that you can’t come in and immediately say someone is doing it “wrong” it’s better to say “oh! You’re doing it differently, and that seems to really work for you! What do you like about it?”

Some of the answers they got for adversarial dynamics, were people who eroticize it and get a lot of emotional fullfilment from the “take down” of a punishment. On either side of the slash.

Some are subs who have poor impulse control, or who really don’t want or have capacity to take a fully equal responsibility role in the relationship. They need the other person to keep them in line, and get a lot of out that structure.

Slaves who really struggle with giving up authority, and really feel like they need to be pushed down regularly to maintain the power exchange. This section would also include people who are slave slaves, but have a dominant type of personality. An example would be like the CEO who runs a business all day and then comes home and needs to take off that mantle. It’s also possible that this type of slave may feel like they have too much power in the dynamic if it’s a teamwork style dynamic. They prefer the top-down punishment oriented authoritarian style.

For the teamwork type of dynamic, they mentioned that some people who may prefer that style are people that have a lot of abuse in their past. They said some people of this type may still enjoy an adversarial relationship, but for others if an adversarial relationship is just too triggering, then a teamwork style dynamic may work better. From either side of the slash.

This style is also may work better for people who excel at finding loopholes in rules and orders.

So they’re really not dogging on one style or the other they’re just trying to educate on a style that they feel is less well-known. They’re putting forth an alternative incase something in the adversarial/authoritarian style isn’t working for you or in your dynamic.

Some notes I took from the class:

- it’s not egalitarian. In this case, the D-type would be more like a team captain. But there is still teamwork to reinforce the dynamic. The s-type is on the same team.

- it’s about finding things that work for both parties, and is usually the dominants role in this style to remind the s-type that they are on the same team and need to find something that works for the team.

- they don’t assign blame. If something happens, they say the “team” messed up. They skip over the blame part, and go right into problem solving. “The team messed up, so what does the team need to do to fix it/solve it” they feel blame is generally unhelpful. And that some of us subbys will go “it wasn’t my fault!” And others will go “it was all my fault, I’m awful 😭” because we are in a more emotionally vulnerable state, and those are our defense mechanisms kicking in but neither attitude actually helps come to a good understanding/outcome/improvement. Masters also do this sometimes, trying to find where the blame is, whose fault, etc. especially when they mess up, which happens, cause they’re human. So, they just skip the blame altogether and jump to problem solving.

Ex, if the master messed up, is it something they could ask their slave to remind them of, as a service? If the slave messed up, what can be modified to help them get it right? Both sides look to see what they can do to help the other. Repair never falls to one person alone.

- submissive are vulnerable and generally prefer their M types to be right even when they’re in disagreement. However, everybody involved as a human being, so your D-type won’t be right all the time. But approaching problems with the mindset of hoping your D-type is right, is a good way to approach things.

- a lot of this type of dynamic just comes from communication and being willing to examine things. An example they used is that the master in this particular dynamic tends to make plans very informally. The sub is on the autistic spectrum and really prefers a more granular concrete plan and the master is just not interested in doing that. So to prevent miscommunications, and to help the sub determine if the master is actually making plans or just musing out loud, they have a protocol. The slave says “ yes, sir” and the Master either responds “oh no, I was just musing” or with further instruction.

- Behavior modification, do not reinforce behavior that you don’t want to see. And positive reinforcement will do better than negative. Punishments don’t actually tend to modify behavior well. The example they used here was that the Master in their dynamic tends to be very busy. And if the slave needs something, it is very rarely done in that instant, if it’s done at all. However, his Master takes his duty of care very seriously. So, when he in emotional crisis, the Master would give immediate attention. And the slave discovered that there were instances he’d allow himself to tip into meltdown, simply because he needed immediate attention, and that was the only way to get it. He brought this up to his Master, and, the solution they found that works for them, is that when he comes to his master with a need, the Master asks him “Can you wait an hour or two?” If the answer is “Yes, Sir” and the slave successfully waits, there is a massive amount of praise and reward for waiting. If the answer is “no” then the Master does his level best to show up immediately, without an emotional meltdown. And this, overtime, programs the submissive to be patient when it’s needed, and to trust that they can still get the need met without a meltdown. Punishing someone for an emotional meltdown down is unlikely to increase trust or help the dynamic in any meaningful way. But behavior modification still very much applies.

- if you have a masochist, punishing them with pain is actually rewarding them 🙃 And some masochists will find ways to misbehave or lash out, because they want to be punished or put back in their place. They may not even do it consciously, they may have a bad day at work and then act out because want or need the catharsis of a heavy punishment. If you do that in a way they find pleasurable, it’ll reinforce them misbehaving. You can do that, if that’s the kind of dynamic you want. But if obedience means more to you… don’t punish a masochist with pain, as it reinforces their disobedience. You can train them to ask for that pain if they need it.

- someone in the chat mentioned that as a masochist, if they aren’t corrected after disobeying, they start feeling they can get away with anything. And they answered by saying that although they don’t have a punishment-centered dynamic, the slave can’t get away with anything. But it’s kind of like splitting hairs, they play with what could technically be considered punishment. There is still consequence. But is focused on behavior modification. They look at motivation. His sub is really motivated by treats/rewards. So they don’t have a “punishment system” but have a reward system. So like… “if you’re good you’ll get a treat” and then if he misbehaves… no treat. The s-type in this style dynamic has to be super honest about what motivates them.

- if the sub “doesn’t know” then it’s time for experimentation. If they don’t know how to solve a problem, then both of you brainstorm for experiments. And if one fails, that’s ok, you try the next. Even if you have to get to “mitten stringing”- a very basic way to make sure it happens. An example of this was slave forgets things so is ordered to carry a notebook. Slave keeps forgetting the notebook. They ended up having him wear it around his neck on a string. And when that was standard and automatic, he was allowed to carry it on his belt. And if that is successful, then maybe they could carry it in their pocket. And then, if that is successful, then they can leave it in their bag. And at some point during this process, they’ll start forgetting it again and that tells you where the problem is so that the two of you can troubleshoot the problem more effectively. Sometimes, the first experiment is “try harder”, but if that doesn’t work, then you need to try something else. “Try harder” can be plan B, but not plan B and plan C and plan D, or they’ll “try harder” right into the dirt. So first is “try harder” and the next step, is making it easier for them to succeed in some way. Setting your slave up for success. It’s not humiliation. It is calibration to the task. 

- there’s a lot of honesty involved. Even if the slave thinks that a plan may not be great, they have to still be willing to try their best at it. There’s a certain amount of good faith and believing in the best of intentions that has to happen from both sides. And even if you start from a place of using their motivations, you can’t rely solely on motivation. The slave has to be dedicated to following the plan, even when they’re not motivated to. It takes.buy in.

They also use another example. The Master wants the slave to say “yes, sir” after an order. The slave keeps forgetting. The Master can then prompt the slave to say it after every order, until it becomes automatic for the slave. One of the instructors said it clicked for him when watching some teachers teaching some special needs children. And the teachers would say “Do you want a snack, yes please or no thank you?” “Do you want to play? Yes please or no thank you?”.

Another example, from their own dynamic, the slave has trouble regulating his emotions and sometimes will get into a headspace where he says things that he doesn’t really mean, and be generally disrespectful. He doesn’t want to say mean things to his Master, he loves his Master. His Master noticed that there is a certain timber to his voice when he’s off mentally like that. And his Master will place him “in silence” which is one of their highest level protocols. Being “in silence” to them, means that he is allowed to communicate and “ask mission critical questions, give short factual answers to direct questions, and have the bare minimum of polite social interaction with other people” but he is not to engage anyone in conversation. And anytime he’d start to get agitated and start to head towards dysregulation, his Master would ask “Do I need to put you into silence?” Asked as a genuine question, not a threat. The Master is asking him to self assess if he’s in the mental space where he needs that protocol to go into effect. And he said it was during a really rough time in his life, but, asking him to have that self-awareness in that way helped. He said 3 times out of 4, he was able to recover. But sometimes he did ask to be put in silence so that he wouldn’t do or say something he’d regret. Sometimes he thought he was ok and his Master had to step in put him into silence when he couldn’t hold it together. It had to be really clear that it wasn’t a punishment. It wasn’t his Master withdrawing in anyway. It was his Master helping him avoid something that could be painful to him later. And he would always check back a couple hours later, and if it was a good check in, then take his slave out of silence.

- If his slave mouths off, instead of yelling at him or escalating, he’ll give a command/order for his slave to rephrase. This gives the slave a second chance to communicate what he actually means, in a less disrespectful way. Ex “How stupid are you?! … Sir” “Rephrase that.” “I fail to understand how the plan you’re suggesting will reach the goal that I believe you have, Sir.”


Some questions they use to assess and troubleshoot:

When the S-type messes up:

1) were you aware of the request?

2) were you aware it was an order not a suggestion

3) did you understand the order, including time frame?

4)did you remember it? Was it intake (in one ear out the other) or were you just not paying attention or did you get distracted? (Setting alarms help with this!)

5) did you under/overestimate your time usage?

6) was it not a priority? (Which could cue the D-type to help prioritize)

7) did a complication come up that you didn’t know how to handle?

Sometimes people come into dynamics with neurospice or even some disabilities. Sometimes that’s the M-type, and the s-type can be a valuable tool to help them. They joked that the slave in their relationship often has to set up email reminders for his Master to promot him to do something in the future.

The both, together as a team, focus on bringing out each others strengths and making each others weakness irrelevant, while consistently reinforcing the dynamic.

But it does require radical honesty on both sides, they said especially the M’s side, about their weakness or impairments, rather than getting caught up in being afraid to show that weakness.

They suggest approaching it as a “How can I use my s-type to make myself better” and, this allows his s-type to feel like his assistant, rather than his parent or caretaker. If you need assistance, you have a very valid place to ask for assistance in your slave.

They use the same problem solving techniques when major life events happen that cause them problems, like when the M-type’s chronic illness took a major leap and he ended up with a disability status.

They also talk about realizing each others strengths and how that can play a part in arguments. One had a lightbulb moment of “oh my god, a lot of our arguments start because I’m irritated with you for doing my job badly!” And how one is detail oriented and the other is big picture oriented. So one wouldn’t understand how the other missed details, while the other would be irritated that the first was so caught up in the details that they couldn’t see the vision.

At the end, someone asked a question about how to integrate this approach into an adversarial/punishment oriented dynamic, and, they recommended finding one area where the punishment/adversarial approach is not working, and to ask the slave to brainstorm with you about a solution. They said the slave may be very resistant to it, and want the Master to just solve it for them. But, it’s important to point out that that didn’t work. And they said to make sure the area of this experiment isn’t a super heavy topic. And it might not work, in which case, you know more about yourselves and how you like to relate. And, it might work really well and be an additional tool in your toolbox.


There is a book that goes into more detail called “Building The Team on alfredpress.com. They said it’s a slim and manageable book, not like some of the others they’ve published.


They also say, near the end, that with this method of problem solving and team work in dynamic, they don’t really feel the need to have “meta talks” or step outside of the dynamic to discuss things. They still could, but they have not felt the need. They said if you, as a D-type, feel the need to get a more collaborative solution… you can order them to collaboratively problem solve with you. Because the submissives mind and intelligence and insight is yours to use. So use it. 😂

That was the end of the class. This post is mostly just me note taking during it, I’ll share my thoughts on another after work 🫶

Text
politikwatch
politikwatch

#Rubio #USA: “Stehen zu #Europa aber nur wenn es so wird wie Amerika” 🤔❓️🤬🤦


Wovon träumt der Nachts❓️🤦


„Rückeroberung der nationalen Grenzen“

“freien, unregulierten Handel“

Rubio hebt hervor, dass die USA weiterhin bereit seien, internationale Verantwortung zu übernehmen, „wenn nötig, auch allein“.


#VERGISS ES USA❗️🖕


Text
thehypermoth
thehypermoth

the march of borgenmax cancermy summer car soundtrack

have a banger while you scroll :3

Text
justatiredghost
justatiredghost

ugh, I wanted to write something jmart for valentine’s, but everything is going wrong in my life.

Text
troger
troger

kilátás fasza volt

Text
unfug-bilder
unfug-bilder

Vermutlich haben einige Mitlesende in den letzten 3 Monaten verständnislos mit dem Kopf geschüttelt, wenn ich mich mal etwas ausführlicher zur Belegschaft der Axel Springer SE und den affilierten Unternehmen ausgelassen habe.

Eigentlich nur für die habe ich diesen Screenshot hier eingestellt.

In meinen Augen wären die beiden in Dresden besser aufgehoben.

Text
goodlivesuckme
goodlivesuckme

💀The UK announced to help Europe in case of emergency! Hopefully they won’t listen to Tony Blair this time, who already discovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. ☠️💀

Text
unfug-bilder
unfug-bilder

© Heiko Sakurai

Text
justatiredghost
justatiredghost

what’s this? I finally managed to write a tiny bit of something? It’s a miracle.

Text
apuzz-blog
apuzz-blog

SLB Internship 2026 Hiring Student Interns in Pune

SLB (formerly Schlumberger) is hiring Student Interns in Pune to support application and business system operations teams. This internship opportunity is ideal for postgraduate students pursuing computing or related disciplines who want practical exposure in enterprise application support and IT operations.
Students interested in working with global IT teams and gaining hands-on experience in…

Text
conatic
conatic

MSC Cruises

Text
furiouswindfulcrum
furiouswindfulcrum

MSC Announces Upgrades to Ocean Cay

MSC Announces Upgrades to Ocean Cay

Source link