Artist’s Shit
Merda d'artista (Artist’s Shit) is a 1961 conceptual artwork by Italian artist Piero Manzoni consisting of 90 numbered tin cans, each measuring approximately 4.8 by 6.5 centimeters and purportedly filled with 30 grams of the artist’s own feces preserved by an unspecified method.[1] Manzoni priced each can according to its weight in gold on the day of purchase, equating the excrement’s value to that of a precious metal and thereby critiquing the commodification and subjective valuation in the art market.[2] The work emerged amid Manzoni’s broader experiments with bodily substances and imprints, such as Artist’s Breath and thumbprints, as a provocative statement on authorship and the fetishization of the artist’s persona over traditional aesthetic or material qualities.[2] Despite its claims, authenticity controversies have persisted, with at least one opened can revealing plaster rather than excrement, raising questions about the consistency of contents across the edition and the conceptual integrity of the piece.[3] In the decades since, individual cans have fetched substantial sums at auction, underscoring the irony of the work’s initial satire on art’s economic absurdity.[4]
[[MORE]]
Historical Context and Creation
Piero Manzoni’s Artistic Evolution
Piero Manzoni was born on July 13, 1933, in Soncino, near Milan, Italy, into a noble family that exposed him to artistic circles during the post-World War II era.[5] His early development drew from the Italian avant-garde, particularly the Spatialist movement led by Lucio Fontana, with whom Manzoni’s family maintained close ties through social connections in Milan and Liguria.[6] These influences encouraged Manzoni’s departure from traditional painting toward experiments questioning artistic authorship and materiality, evident in his initial abstract works before 1959.
By 1959, Manzoni initiated his Linee (Lines) series, producing continuous ink lines of fixed lengths—ranging from 1 meter to over 100 meters—drawn on paper rolls and sealed in cylindrical metal or cardboard containers with certificates specifying the exact measurement and date.[7] This methodical output, totaling around 100 lines by 1961, shifted focus from visual representation to the verifiable act of creation itself, commodifying the artist’s gesture in a portable, authenticated form.[8]
Concurrently, from late 1959 to 1960, Manzoni created Corpi d'aria (Bodies of Air), a limited edition of 45 pneumatic sculptures each comprising a wooden base, inflatable balloon, mouthpiece, and stamped certificate bearing his fingerprint.[9] Buyers were instructed to inflate the balloon with their own breath or the artist’s, transforming ephemeral human exhalation into a saleable artwork priced at 30,000 lire, thus extending authorship to the viewer’s participation while emphasizing the body’s intangible outputs.[10]
This trajectory culminated in 1961 with Sculture viventi (Living Sculptures), where Manzoni issued Certificati di autenticità (Certificates of Authenticity) declaring purchasers—often friends or gallery visitors—as artworks themselves upon signing their bodies, priced by body weight in grams of gold.[11] These acts progressively equated the artist’s physical presence and biological traces with aesthetic value, laying groundwork for further provocations in materiality. Manzoni’s career ended abruptly on February 6, 1963, when he suffered a myocardial infarction at age 29 in his Milan studio, constraining his total output to under a decade of production.[12]
Development and Production in 1961
In May 1961, Italian artist Piero Manzoni produced Merda d'artista (“Artist’s Shit”), consisting of 90 sealed tin cans each containing 30 grams of feces purportedly his own.[13] The edition was created as a limited series numbered 001 to 090, with Manzoni signing each lid.[14][15]
The cans measured 6.5 cm in diameter and 4.8 cm in height, utilizing standard canning processes to seal the contents, thereby preserving them without detectable odor.[13][16] Labels affixed to each can bore text in Italian, English, French, and German: “Merda d'artista (Artist’s Shit) / contents, 30 gr net / freshly preserved / produced and tinned in May 1961.”[15][17]
Manzoni priced each can according to the market value of 30 grams of gold on 20 May 1961, equating the work’s worth directly to the artist’s bodily output in a literal economic critique of contemporary art valuation.[14][18] Initial distribution occurred through Milan galleries, including sales facilitated by associates in the local art scene.[19] Certificates of authenticity accompanied the numbered edition to verify provenance.[13]
Physical Composition and Authenticity
Description of the Cans
Each of the 90 cans in Piero Manzoni’s Merda d'artista (Artist’s Shit) measures approximately 4.8 cm in height by 6.4 cm in diameter, constructed from standard tinplate with a soldered lid for sealing.[20][21] The exterior features a blue printed paper label wrapped around the body, displaying the title Merda d'artista, Manzoni’s signature, the edition number (1 to 90), and production specifics including “Peso netto gr. 30” (net weight 30 grams) and “Prodotto e conservato fresco nel maggio 1961” (produced and preserved fresh in May 1961).[22][23]
The cans purport to contain 30 grams of Manzoni’s own excrement per unit, sealed without preservatives or additives shortly after production in Milan during 1961.[24][14] Accompanying each numbered can was a certificate of authenticity signed by the artist, affirming the contents as his feces prepared and canned in that year.[14]
The packaging emulates small commercial food tins, with the label’s typographic style and bilingual text (Italian and English) evoking consumer product branding from the era.[14] Due to the material’s susceptibility to corrosion from imperfect seals, surviving examples are typically maintained in climate-controlled institutional storage to mitigate degradation of the tinplate and lid.[20]
Verification and Contents Disputes
In 1969, the Tate Gallery acquired one of Manzoni’s cans but has never opened it, citing the need to preserve its integrity and market value, with curators noting that the artwork’s authenticity relies on the sealed state and accompanying certificate rather than empirical contents verification.[25] Similarly, institutions such as the Museum of Modern Art hold unopened examples, prioritizing scarcity-driven economic factors over destructive testing, as opening would irreversibly diminish resale potential despite advanced analytical capabilities like spectrometry being feasible for non-invasive checks.[26]
Public openings remain exceedingly rare, with anecdotal reports of at least 45 cans bursting due to internal pressure from presumed decomposition gases, though spilled contents were not systematically analyzed or confirmed as feces.[17] A notable claim emerged in 2007 when Italian artist Agostino Bonalumi, a close collaborator of Manzoni, asserted in an interview that the cans contained plaster rather than excrement, reasoning that Manzoni could not physiologically produce the required 2.7 kilograms (90 cans at 30 grams each) in the short production window, and that substitutes were used to fulfill the edition.[3] This allegation, tied to surging auction prices around a London sale fetching £81,000 for one can, fueled speculation of production inconsistencies or fraud, though no independent scientific corroboration followed, and Bonalumi’s statement reflects personal testimony rather than forensic evidence.
Debates persist over uniform contents across the edition, exacerbated by Manzoni’s death in 1963 at age 29, which precludes direct artist confirmation, and the absence of peer-reviewed chemical analyses on opened samples.[27] While some unverified accounts describe dried, feces-resembling material in rare inspections, others suggest decay artifacts or non-organic fillers mimicking expected texture, underscoring how certification documents and edition numbering, not verifiable substance, causally determine perceived authenticity and value in the art market.[14]
Economic Dimensions and Market Dynamics
Original Pricing Strategy
Piero Manzoni established the pricing for Merda d'artista by valuing each 30-gram can of feces at the equivalent market price of 30 grams of gold, a deliberate mechanism tying the artwork’s worth to a fluctuating commodity standard rather than traditional artistic criteria. Produced and sealed in May 1961, the cans were offered at approximately $35 per unit, corresponding to the prevailing gold price of $35 per troy ounce (31.1 grams).[14] This formula—30 grams of artist’s excrement equated to 30 grams of gold—extended the valuation from the material’s weight alone, positioning the contents as a proxy for the artist’s bodily output without regard for sensory or utilitarian qualities.[18]
The approach functioned as an economic experiment, assigning value through arbitrary equivalence to expose how market dynamics could elevate ephemeral matter via certification and scarcity. Initial distribution yielded sparse sales among the 90 cans, with buyers acquiring them primarily through galleries in Milan and Europe at the gold-linked rate, underscoring the strategy’s reliance on the artist’s emerging reputation over immediate demand.[14] Unsold units remained in dealer inventories, where the fixed gold-based pricing provided a baseline for subsequent transactions, though original offerings emphasized equivalence to precious metal over speculative markup. This model empirically demonstrated art valuation’s detachment from production costs, predicating worth on persona-driven scarcity in a nascent conceptual market.[28]
Auction Records and Value Appreciation
Initial resales of Merda d'artista cans in the decades following their 1961 production remained modest, reflecting limited market interest in Manzoni’s conceptual provocations during his lifetime and immediate posthumous period. Values began appreciating noticeably in the late 20th century amid growing recognition of Manzoni’s influence on post-war European art, with sales in the 1990s occasionally exceeding $50,000 as institutional collections sought examples.[29] By the early 2000s, prices had escalated further; for instance, the Tate Gallery acquired a can in 2000 for £22,350, signaling broader curatorial acceptance.[3]
Subsequent auctions demonstrated sharp value growth, driven by the work’s finite supply—90 cans originally produced, with an estimated 45 or fewer remaining intact due to explosions from unpreserved contents, openings, or losses—and controlled authentication by the Fondazione Piero Manzoni, which certifies legitimacy and restricts market entry.[17] Key record sales include a 2007 Christie’s auction of can No. 54 for £182,500 (approximately $360,000 at the time), and a 2016 Milan sale of No. 69 for €275,000 (about $300,000), setting a then-world record amid surging demand for conceptual artifacts.[22] [30]
Post-2020, despite broader art market fluctuations from economic uncertainty, Merda d'artista values have held stable at high levels, with private sale estimates often surpassing $300,000 and auction lots commanding premiums due to speculative interest in branded scarcity rather than material properties. This persistence underscores bubble-like dynamics in the contemporary art economy, where provenance and narrative hype elevate priced items far beyond comparable commodities, as critiqued in analyses of Manzoni’s oeuvre as a parody of value assignment.[32] [16]
Interpretations and Philosophical Underpinnings
Manzoni’s Stated Intentions
Piero Manzoni articulated Merda d'artista as a radical assertion of artistic autonomy, positing excrement as the artist’s most direct and unmediated bodily production, superior to traditional media like paint or marble in its authenticity and immediacy. By canning his feces in 1961, he rejected aesthetic hierarchies that privilege skill or beauty, instead elevating waste as a pure emanation of the self, free from external manipulation. This aligned with his broader oeuvre, where the body served as the origin of art, as seen in contemporaneous works like Fiato d'artista (Artist’s Breath), emphasizing organic traces over fabricated forms.[2]
In accompanying declarations, Manzoni equated the transformative power of artistic intent with alchemical reversal, stating that “if the artist says his shit is gold, it is gold,” thereby satirizing the arbitrary assignment of value in art and commerce, where perception overrides material reality. This pronouncement critiqued the commodification rampant in Italy’s miracolo economico of the late 1950s and early 1960s, exposing how institutional endorsement could elevate the profane to the prized, independent of intrinsic properties.[14]
While drawing from Dada’s irreverence and Marcel Duchamp’s readymades—which repurposed everyday objects—Manzoni stressed the distinction of his material’s vital, personal genesis, produced internally rather than appropriated externally, to affirm the artist’s sovereignty over meaning. He envisioned the work as a preserved annual output, sealing portions of his excrement to maintain its “freshness” as an enduring testament to creative essence.[14][2]
The project’s origins trace to Manzoni’s patrician upbringing in a Milanese industrial family; his father, Egisto Manzoni, who operated a meat-canning factory, allegedly dismissed Piero’s pursuits with the barb, “Your work is shit,” prompting the son to literalize the insult as defiant reclamation, turning dismissal into a foundational act of value inversion.[14][26]
Broader Conceptual Critiques
Critics sympathetic to conceptual art interpret Merda d'artista as a deliberate subversion of bourgeois art conventions, transforming excrement—a base, ephemeral substance—into a commodified artifact that interrogates the constructed nature of artistic value and authenticity.[2] By pricing each 30-gram can equivalent to its weight in gold on the production date in May 1961, Manzoni highlighted the arbitrary mechanisms of the art market, echoing broader challenges to traditional notions of originality and the “aura” of unique objects in an era of mass reproduction.[33] This perspective posits the work as a provocative commentary on consumerism, where the artist’s bodily output becomes a personalized extension of creative labor, defying expectations of aesthetic refinement.[34]
Skeptical deconstructions, however, reduce the piece to an elaborate stunt predicated on exploiting audience gullibility and institutional credulity, with its purported profundity unmasked as performative provocation lacking substantive artistic merit.[35] Empirical examination reveals that surging auction values—such as the 2007 sale of one can for €180,000—stem not from inherent qualities but from speculative hype amplified by celebrity narratives and collector prestige, debunking myths of unassailable “genius” in post-war modern art.[36] These critiques emphasize observable market behaviors where promotional discourse and scarcity engineering eclipse content, rendering the work a case study in value inflation detached from verifiable aesthetic or intellectual contributions.[37]
Causal analyses draw parallels to psychological undercurrents, such as Freudian coprophilia, wherein feces symbolize infantile gift-giving or creative potency, yet Manzoni’s alchemical elevation of waste underscores a mythic transformation belied by prosaic realities of production and trade.[38] Grounded in art market data, this reveals how celebrity attribution trumps material essence, with the cans’ authentication reliant on Manzoni’s signature rather than empirical content verification, perpetuating a system where narrative potency drives economic outcomes over intrinsic properties.[14]
Perspectives aligned with free-market principles affirm the work’s valuation as a pure outcome of voluntary exchange, yet critique avant-garde conceptualism—including Merda d'artista—for its institutional subsidization and estrangement from standards of beauty, skill, or alignment with productive societal labor.[39] This detachment, often propped by public funding and elite curation, contrasts with market-driven appraisals that expose the fragility of claims to transcendence when stripped of external validation, highlighting a rift between subsidized experimentation and value rooted in consumer demand or traditional craftsmanship.[40]
Reception, Controversies, and Cultural Impact
Initial Public and Critical Responses
Upon its debut in May 1961, Merda d'artista elicited a range of responses within Milan’s avant-garde circles, with some viewing the sealed cans as a bold conceptual innovation challenging commodification in art, while others dismissed it as an immature provocation lacking substantive merit.[6] The work’s presentation at galleries such as Galleria Hanappe limited immediate public outrage, as the tins’ opacity prevented direct confrontation with the purported contents, resulting in more subdued debate than overt scandal compared to Manzoni’s prior bodily interventions.[41] Initial sales were minimal, with only a few of the 90 cans reportedly purchased at the artist’s pricing of 30 grams equivalent to the daily gold value (approximately $37 per can), underscoring public and collector ambivalence toward its audacity.[17]
Following Manzoni’s death on February 6, 1963, the work gained wider notoriety across Europe, featured in exhibitions that amplified its shock value in media accounts focused primarily on the literal and metaphorical implications rather than aesthetic depth.[42] Critics aligned with modernist trends, such as Gillo Dorfles, lauded elements of Manzoni’s oeuvre—including Merda d'artista—for embodying an anti-establishment edge that critiqued bourgeois art norms, positioning it within broader 1960s experiments in dematerialization and absurdity.[6] Conversely, traditionalist voices in Italian and European press decried the piece as obscene vulgarity, interpreting it as emblematic of cultural decadence wherein provocation supplanted technical skill or traditional craftsmanship.[41][43] This polarization reflected deeper tensions in postwar art discourse, with empirical evidence of sparse early transactions indicating that acclaim remained confined to niche avant-garde audiences amid broader skepticism.[14]
Ongoing Debates on Artistic Legitimacy
Critics argue that Merda d'artista lacks intrinsic artistic merit, as it demonstrates no technical skill, aesthetic appeal, or communicative depth beyond the artist’s self-declaration, reducing art to arbitrary labeling rather than creation.[44] This perspective holds that equating preserved feces with art erodes objective standards, inviting the reductio ad absurdum that any object or excrement could qualify as artwork, thereby commodifying provocation at the expense of craft and universality.[45] Proponents, however, defend its legitimacy as a conceptual breakthrough that interrogates the fetishization of the artist’s persona and the art market’s valuation mechanisms, though such claims are scrutinized for prioritizing intent over tangible qualities.
Cultural analyses highlight how institutions, often supported by public funds, exhibit Merda d'artista—as in the Tate’s holdings—while sidelining representational works, revealing a preferential tolerance for scatological shock value that aligns with avant-garde norms but selectively disregards bodily taboos in non-progressive contexts. This institutional embrace prompts logical critiques: if excrement’s artistic status derives from context rather than inherent properties, it exposes pretensions in subsidized cultural gatekeeping, where empirical disgust is overridden by elite consensus.[46]
In the 2020s, social media discourse has intensified scam perceptions through memes likening the work to ephemeral stunts like Maurizio Cattelan’s duct-taped banana, portraying Merda d'artista as emblematic of hype-driven fraud in contemporary markets.[47] Authenticity disputes further erode legitimacy; in 1989, artist Bernard Bazile opened a can for display, revealing desiccated contents encased in a smaller tin—possibly plaster rather than feces—contradicting claims of 30 grams of artist’s excrement per can and amplifying arguments that the work’s value hinges on unverified faith rather than verifiable substance. These episodes sustain a truth-seeking tension: while institutional persistence affirms a form of cultural artifact status, logical scrutiny reveals its endurance as potentially causal to market dynamics rather than artistic profundity.[45]
Influence on Contemporary Art Markets
Manzoni’s Merda d'artista established a precedent for decoupling artistic value from material substance, pricing each 30-gram can equivalent to its weight in gold at approximately $37 in 1961, yet achieving resale values far exceeding gold’s appreciation, such as $67,000 per can at Sotheby’s in 1991—over 70 times gold’s contemporaneous ounce price of $374.[14] This model emphasized certificates of authenticity and conceptual framing over physical content, influencing the market’s acceptance of works where provenance and scarcity dictate worth, as seen in the sealed cans’ enduring trade value, with individual tins fetching up to €124,000 at auction.[48] Such dynamics contributed to conceptual art’s market dominance, shifting emphasis from craftsmanship to idea-driven commodities and enabling high valuations for minimal-effort outputs tied to the artist’s persona.
The work’s legacy amplified the commodification of shock and body-based art, paving pathways for later practitioners like Damien Hirst, whose preserved animal installations—echoing Manzoni’s alchemical transmutation of base matter—have commanded multimillion-dollar sales, such as The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living for $8 million in 2004, though direct causal links remain interpretive rather than explicit.[49] Similarly, Andres Serrano’s Piss Christ (1987), submerging a crucifix in urine, extended the provocation-commodity paradigm, with prints selling for tens of thousands, reflecting normalized market tolerance for bodily detritus as high-value provocations.[50] These evolutions underscore Merda d'artista’s role in broadening conceptual art’s economic footprint, prefiguring body, performance, and land art markets by prioritizing the artist’s output as a scarce, certifiable asset.[51]
Parallels extend to the NFT boom of 2021–2022, where digital certificates imposed scarcity on reproducible files, mirroring Manzoni’s transformation of ubiquitous excrement into limited-edition value through buyer belief in authorship and blockchain validation, as in Beeple’s Everydays: The First 5,000 Days fetching $69 million at Christie’s.[52] This precedent facilitated NFT art sales exceeding $2 billion in 2021, trading on conceptual scarcity akin to Manzoni’s tins, though without physical anchors, highlighting market reliance on shared perceptual equivalence over tangible utility.[52]
Critics argue this normalization eroded merit-based valuation, fostering inflation detached from skill or beauty—contemporary art auctions routinely exceed $10 billion annually, with conceptual pieces comprising a disproportionate share despite minimal production costs, enabling elite signaling over accessible aesthetics.[16] Proponents counter that it democratized definitions, challenging institutional gatekeeping and expanding market inclusivity for idea-centric works, though empirical surges in post-Manzoni conceptual sales suggest causal reinforcement of speculation-driven economics rather than intrinsic merit.[4]
References
- https://www.moma.org/collection/works/80768
- https://www.theartstory.org/artist/manzoni-piero/
- https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/artblog/2007/jun/12/shitmanzonisworkdoesntdow
- https://www.hauserwirth.com/ursula/32455-shit-talking-manzoni/
- https://www.artnet.com/artists/piero-manzoni/biography
- https://www.hauserwirth.com/artists/2862-piero-manzoni/
- https://www.hauserwirth.com/hauser-wirth-exhibitions/24197-piero-manzoni-lines-materials-time/
- https://www.hauserwirth.com/ursula/25222-piero-manzonis-lines/
- https://www.boijmans.nl/en/collection/artworks/114872/corpo-d-aria
- https://jefverheyen.ensembles.org/actors/piero-manzoni?item=1196
- https://www.pieromanzoni.org/pieromanzoni/biographies/30/sculture-viventi?lang=en
- https://www.moma.org/collection/works/204085
- https://www.pieromanzoni.org/pieromanzoni/biographies/32/la-merda-dartista?lang=en
- https://www.tate.org.uk/tate-etc/issue-10-summer-2007/excremental-value
- https://fontsinuse.com/uses/32859/piero-manzoni-artists-shit
- https://visual-worlds.org/2019/09/01/piero-manzoni-the-economics-of-artistic-aura/
- https://expositionreview.com/issues/vol-ii-surface/merda-di-scrittrice/
- https://alphahistory.com/pastpeculiar/1961-italian-artist-sells-own-dung-price-of-gold/
- https://www.artforum.com/columns/piero-manzoni-at-gagosian-190858/
- https://www.artsy.net/artwork/piero-manzoni-merda-dartista-31
- https://www.mutualart.com/Article/Excremental-Value/976E0A949B691591
- https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-5939872
- https://www.wright20.com/auctions/2023/12/editions-works-on-paper/204
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369702107701116
- https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/manzoni-artists-shit-t07667
- https://news.artnet.com/art-world/art-bites-manzoni-artists-shit-2445701
- https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2007/jun/13/art
- https://www.artsy.net/artwork/piero-manzoni-artists-shit-no-31
- https://www.artnet.com/artists/piero-manzoni/merda-d-artista-KcGwrcVmi_JgY9mtWg8UOg2
- https://www.firstonline.info/en/record-mondiale-per-piero-manzoni-275-000-euro-per-merda-dartista-n-69/
- https://allthatsinteresting.com/piero-manzoni
- https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/piero-manzoni-artist-literally-sold-shit/
- https://www.artnet.com/magazineus/reviews/davis/davis3-24-09.asp?print=1
- https://tahneyalexandramay.com/index.php/2018/11/01/piero-manzoni-and-his-shit/
- https://artofericwayne.com/2014/08/16/the-great-sacrifice-of-conceptual-art/
- https://dam-oclc.bac-lac.gc.ca/download?is_thesis=1&oclc_number=1032986276&id=42ef000c-5f5b-4d29-93ca-43fd8b0f0f7e&fileName=Nelson_Joshua_201305_MA.pdf
- https://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/topic/conceptual-art-is-crap/
- https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerald-Silk-2/publication/270314401_Myths_and_Meanings_in_Manzoni%27s_Merda_d%27artista/links/5bd1c750299bf14eac8450c0/Myths-and-Meanings-in-Manzonis-Merda-dartista.pdf
- https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/11/poop-swastika-conceptual-art-triumph/
- https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conceptual-art/
- https://www.merdadartista.org/27/shit-talking/
- https://www.finestresullarte.info/en/exhibitions/piero-manzoni-s-merda-d-artista-turns-60-years-old-a-project-in-milan-celebrates-it
- https://www.oddee.com/item_98781.aspx
- https://www.contemporaryartissue.com/the-30-most-controversial-artworks-today/
- https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/art-is-eating-itself/
- https://www.rightclicksave.com/article/nobody-works-at-the-canvas-museum
- https://www.frieze.com/article/banana-art-fair-maurizio-cattelan-comedian-opinion-2024
- https://factrepublic.com/facts/50558/
- https://leoplaw.com/2008/12/11/damien-hirst-rijksmuseum-ultimate-bling/
- https://www.theartstory.org/artist/serrano-andres/
- https://artblart.com/tag/piero-manzoni-when-bodies-became-art/
- https://www.beyondnewmedia.art/texts/alchemical-sublimations-authorship-scarcity-and-value-from-merda-dartista-to-the-nfts/
