Do you know much about ukranian philosophy?
«No one will build us a state if we don’t build it ourselves, and none of us will make a nation if we ourselves don’t want to be a nation».
Hello, I’m Sofiia, and I’m a young researcher and scientist who’s the main goal is to learn and popularize the unique ukranian philosophy.
Today, we’ll talk about the first ukranian conservator who is considered the father of Ukrainian conservatism – Viachelav (Vazlav) Lypynsky.
[[MORE]]
He was born on 5(17)th April 1882 in in the village of Zaturtsi, Volodymyr-Volynskyi Povit(County), Volyn, in a noble polish family, so technically he was an ethnic Pole, but the main thing, that Viachelav since his birth adored ukranian culture and had a strong connect with it. He even said that the first language for him was ukranian, because of his nanny and other hired workers, who were ukranians and spoke only ukranian.
(And there I will make it a little bit clear. In that time, Ukraine was under two main empires: Russian and Austro-Hungarian, so the village of Zaturtsi was under the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The greatest nurturing of the nationality was in the villages where the most national traditions were preserved.)
Later, as a student, he politically identified himself as a “Ukrainian” but did not renounce his Polish heritage, but at the same time insisted on the formation of the Ukrainian idea.
(And here, his first judgment about the nation follows, that is, a nation is not an ethnic community, but united responsible citizens who are ready to serve their state.)
It is not surprising because this ardent idea in his heart, which had flourished since childhood, was revealed precisely by the then Kyiv Gymnasium No. 1, where, it is believed, the formation of his political position had already begun.
So, after a short excursion into history, let’s return to philosophy.
Viacheslav is famous for his concept of state building, which in a certain sense can be called autobiographical because some of them, again, take their origin from his childhood. Lypynsky develops a holistic vision of Ukrainian statehood based on a combination of personal morality and civic duty. His critical view of disorder, narrow-partyism, lack of responsibility, and excessive emotional patriotism did not mean a denial of freedom. On the contrary, he sought to transform it into an organized and responsible political culture. He describes this in detail in his work «Letters to the Hliborobs(Peasents)–Brothers», wich was written in 1921.
Also, Viachelav had an interesting way of understanding the relationship between person and the state, which is of particular importance. He denied both excessive individualism, which undermines cohesion, and collectivism, which reduces personal responsibility. In his opinion, a citizen is a full-fledged political subject only when he realizes his responsibility for the future of the country. Wich is pretty logical, because for what will you fight for, if you don’t care about you country and your people.
His philosophy is still actual for Ukraine, that nowadays still in a war, just like almost 110 years ago, where a long, sustained struggle requires a common idea and goal, namely the state and your people.
That’s it for today. Let me know if you want to know more!
XOXO😽❤️