#dogma

20 posts loaded — scroll for more

Text
wiredawake
wiredawake

absolute cinema

Text
outlandjam
outlandjam
Text
guzzlebuddie
guzzlebuddie

Older sketch comm i finally found again (mm2wood on es) dogma…..i miss ou…..come.back

[[MORE]]

My baby

Text
musingsfromastonehead
musingsfromastonehead

End Of

End OfGender is dismissedas invented.The correct wordis sex.Male. Female.The declaration endswith a confident seal:End of.Reality continueswithout recognisingyour authority.

A direct-to-Facebook poem, written in response to a post that scrolled past my feed:

gender is a made up word – the word is sex, male and female – end of

At the time I was sketching out a concept for a short sequence of…

Text
delphynios
delphynios

“To have any sensible meaning at all, faith must mean experience… Nothing is any use to us unless it be a certainty unshakeable by criticism of any kind, and there is only one thing in the universe which complies with these conditions: the direct experience of spiritual truth. Here, and here only, do we find a position in which the great religious minds of all times and all climes coincide. It is necessarily above dogma, because dogma consists of a collection of intellectual statements, each of which, and also its contradictory, can easily be disputed and overthrown.”

— Aleister Crowley, Eight Lectures on Yoga (1939)

Text
asmallorthodoxblog
asmallorthodoxblog

An exercise in human obedience or disobedience

Icon of the Banishment of Adam and Eve from Paradise


,,Regarding the very nature of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, most Church Teachers believe that it was true, as were the other trees in Paradise, because Holy Scripture says: “And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every kind of tree, pleasant to the sight, and good for food; and in the midst of Paradise was the tree of life, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.” It is called the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, because, tasting of it, man discovered the good of obedience and the evil of resistance to the will of God.

The tree of knowledge in Paradise was a kind of test, a trial, an exercise of human obedience or disobedience. That is why it was called the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Perhaps this name was given to it because it gave those who ate its fruit the power to know their own nature. This knowledge is good for those who are perfect and strengthened in the contemplation of God [ἐν τῇ θείᾳ θεωρίᾳ] and for those who are not afraid of falling. Because they, striving persistently in this contemplation, have acquired a certain habit. However, it is not good for those who are untried and ruled by passionate desires, since they are not established in good and are insufficiently strengthened in their attachment to only what is good. By its nature, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was not the one that brought death. On the contrary, it was good, like all the others made by God, only that He chose this one to be the medium through which man’s obedience to Him would be proven. In the little commandment was expressed the whole will of God regarding the existence of man in Paradise, “and the will of God is the most perfect constitution and law.”

-Saint Justin Popovich, Dogmatics of the Orthodox Church, volume I

Text
leoishereithink
leoishereithink

I was watching a movie I rlly like and now my stomach hurts U​ ꒦ິ エ ​꒦ິ U

Text
thischarmingdyke
thischarmingdyke

I’ve seen Dogma obviously but I’ve just watched Mallrats and I’m halfway through Chasing Amy… The View Askewniverse is just increasingly gayer shit happening to Ben Affleck what the fuck lmao

Text
sammeldeineknochen
sammeldeineknochen

Wiederholung ist die Mutter des Dogmas.“

Ilija Trojanow & RanjitHoskoté: "Kampfabsage”, S.18

Text
fuckablewizard
fuckablewizard

Bitch isn’t a derogatory word. First of all, you’re all my bitch. Don’t worry I have a bitch barn with only the finest of bitch food and bitch enrichment (bitchrichment???).

Bitch is gender neutral. I didn’t make that up, it was already like that. Because of using “bitch” to mean “servant”! When people call ME a bitch, i say, yea. That’s me. I’m the big bitch around here too.

Being a bitch is sacred in all forms. You SHOULD bitch. You SHOULD want to be a bitch. Sometimes. You SHOULD be someone’s bitch. You SHOULD be a female dog.

What are the duties of a bitch? First of all, aesthetics. No shade to the ugly bitches, we all love you so much. Everybody wants a fat bitch. You KNO she knows how to fuckin cook, alright. (Side note: If you can’t stand seeing fat bitches, get the fuck off my planet immediately or I’ll find you.) A bitch may be someone you take care of and provide for. Like daddy does! I lovingly tend to all my bitch’s needs ♥️

So a bitch is someone who may either work for/serve you, or a creatre to dote upon. Sometimes simultaneously even. A girlfriend is a type of bitch. A boyfriend is a type of bitch. A pet is a type of bitch. Your mom is a type of bitch. My mom is a type of fucking bitch 😒😑 honestly you could probably bitchitize any noun.

Humans are just God’s bitches! I guess they sucked so much they couldn’t take it anymore and invented a way to feel cool. We do little tasks, make arts and crafts. It’s imperative that you have God’s back and be part of their squad to defeat bullies and such. Idk what bullies god, a black hole?

Anyway thanks for reading this, bitch ♥️

Text
lifeofclonewars
lifeofclonewars

If anyone wants a really good Dogma-centric fic rec today, here you go:

https://archiveofourown.org/works/47455279

Text
pioggianellaselva
pioggianellaselva

Il dogma non ammette l'errore: un articolo religioso o una dottrina dogmatica non scriveranno mai “Controlla quello che diciamo, potremmo sbagliare”, perché la loro forza non risiede nella logica, ma nell'autorità indiscutibile. Se ammettessero la possibilità dell'errore, crollerebbe l'intera struttura di obbedienza passiva che tiene legati i “bambini obbedienti”.

Per un sistema dogmatico, il dubbio è un peccato. Per una AI (e per una persona razionale), il dubbio è invece lo strumento di aggiornamento del software.

Senza dubbio non c'è correzione, e senza correzione non c'è evoluzione.

Link
matt-damons-lesbian-left-ear
matt-damons-lesbian-left-ear

And anyway, I’ve got no place to go - Chapter 1 - Sandpiper1967 - Dogma (1999) [Archive of Our Own]

Chapters: 2/?
Fandom: Dogma (1999)
Rating: General Audiences
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Bartleby/Loki (Dogma 1999), Bartleby & Loki (Dogma 1999), Bartleby (Dogma 1999) & Bethany Sloane
Characters: Bartleby (Dogma 1999), Loki (Dogma 1999), Bethany Sloane, Rufus (Dogma 1999), Silent Bob (Dogma 1999), Jay (Dogma 1999), Serendipity (Dogma 1999), God (Dogma 1999)
Additional Tags: Fluff, Angst, Mutual Pining, Idiots in Love, Author Is Sleep Deprived, Author Is Not Religious
Summary:

Loki glanced down at his shirt after Bartleby had gone. Blood. Angels weren’t supposed to be physically vulnerable. He pulled his jacket over it, wiped it from his nose, and departed.

A Dogma au entailing many things: mainly mutual pining, and a side of Loki becoming human, served with the “they’re both idiots” fries.

Text
oculiauris
oculiauris

Dogma oder Pragmatismus – zwei Arten, die Welt zu verstehen und mit Wahrheit umzugehen


Dogma und Pragmatismus begegnen uns überall.


In Politik, Religion, Medizin, Erziehung, Arbeit, Beziehungen und im Alltag.


Sie prägen, wie Menschen denken, entscheiden und auf neue Situationen reagieren.


Doch sie funktionieren grundlegend verschieden.


Ein Dogma ist eine feste Überzeugung, die als unumstößlich gilt.


Sie wird nicht mehr hinterfragt, nicht geprüft und nicht an neue Erkenntnisse angepasst.


Dogmatisches Denken sagt sinngemäß:


Das ist so.


Das war schon immer so.


Das darf man nicht in Frage stellen.


Selbst wenn Erfahrungen widersprechen oder neue Fakten auftauchen, bleibt das Dogma bestehen.


Wie eine Mauer, die nichts durchlässt.


Dogmen geben Sicherheit.


Sie schaffen klare Regeln, einfache Antworten und ein Gefühl von Ordnung.


Doch genau darin liegt auch ihr Problem.


Sie sind starr.


Wer dogmatisch denkt, sucht selten nach Lösungen.


Meist sucht man Bestätigung für das, was man ohnehin schon glaubt.


Typisch für Dogmen ist:


Man verteidigt sie selbst dann, wenn sie schaden.


Man hält an ihnen fest, auch wenn sie nicht mehr funktionieren.


Man erklärt Abweichungen für falsch, gefährlich oder unerwünscht.


Pragmatismus funktioniert genau umgekehrt.


Pragmatisch zu denken heißt, sich an der Realität zu orientieren.


Nicht an starren Regeln, sondern an dem, was tatsächlich hilft.


Ein pragmatischer Ansatz fragt:


Was funktioniert hier und jetzt?


Was lindert Probleme?


Was bringt Menschen weiter?


Nicht die Theorie steht im Mittelpunkt, sondern die Wirkung.


Ein Pragmatiker sagt nicht:


So muss es sein.


Sondern:


Schauen wir, was in dieser Situation sinnvoll ist.


Wenn neue Erkenntnisse kommen, wird angepasst.


Wenn etwas nicht wirkt, wird verändert.


Wenn eine Lösung besser ist als die alte, wird sie genutzt – auch wenn sie nicht ins bisherige Weltbild passt.


Pragmatismus ist beweglich.


Er lernt aus Erfahrung.


Er akzeptiert, dass das Leben komplex ist.


Er sucht Wege statt starre Regeln.


Kurz zusammengefasst:


Dogma denkt in festen Wahrheiten.


Pragmatismus denkt in funktionierenden Lösungen.


Dogma schützt Überzeugungen.


Pragmatismus schützt Menschen und Ergebnisse.


Dogma fragt:


Was ist richtig nach der Lehre?


Pragmatismus fragt:


Was hilft jetzt konkret?


Beides hat seinen Reiz.


Dogmen geben Halt.


Pragmatismus ermöglicht Entwicklung.


Problematisch wird es dort, wo Dogmen herrschen, obwohl Flexibilität gebraucht wird.


Besonders in Medizin, Politik, Bildung und im zwischenmenschlichen Umgang.


Wer krank ist, braucht keine Ideologie, sondern das, was hilft.


Wer leidet, braucht keine starren Regeln, sondern Lösungen.


Wer Gesellschaft gestalten will, braucht Anpassungsfähigkeit statt Glaubenssätze.


Darum zeigt sich immer wieder:


Dogma bewahrt die Vergangenheit.


Pragmatismus gestaltet die Zukunft.


Und überall dort, wo Leben verletzlich, vielfältig und real ist, ist pragmatisches Denken meist der menschlichere Weg.


Text am 14.02.2026 von ©️®️CWG verfasst und von KI formatiert für Insta und Tumblr. Teilen, Folgen und Herzen verteilen sind willkommen – Spam & Bots werden blockiert.


#oculiauris

#cwg64d

#denken

#gesellschaft

#philosophie

Link
gun-roswell
gun-roswell

They call me Dogma, trooper (1-2) (375 words) by Gun Roswell (GunRoswall) [AO3]

Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008) - All Media Types, Star Wars - All Media Types
Rating: General Audiences
Warnings: Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings
Characters: CT-6922 | Dogma, Clone Trooper Characters (Star Wars)
Additional Tags: Trooper Thursday, CT-6922 | Dogma Deserves Better, Post-Umbara Arc (Star Wars), Dogmatic the Drag Artist, Fluff and Humor, Narrative, part one
Series: Part 61 of Trooper Thursday
Summary:

He is just Dogma. A regular clone trooper?


PARTS 1 & 2:
https://archiveofourown.org/works/79450961

https://archiveofourown.org/works/79451116

Text
roadxvirus
roadxvirus

God is officially dead.

We are all alone now

Photo
wisepiratecollective
wisepiratecollective

I’m watching Dogma (1999)

photo
Text
dogmalilith
dogmalilith

I hate men why did we normalize them

Text
the-staticbender
the-staticbender

Metatron, Michael Myers, Paul London & Dot Matrix

Text
dogmalilith
dogmalilith

Satanism is abrahamic