There is a certain pleasure in never having felt belonging: nothing can bind one to the world.
There is a certain pleasure in never having felt belonging: nothing can bind one to the world.
― Atrona Grizel
My writings have this peculiar trait: because I write with complete selectivity, most of those who read them are already wandering in the depths I traverse; those on the surface, after reading a few lines, perceive the density and intensity and, bewildered, simply abandon them—like a monolith whose meaning only certain souls can grasp. I know I will never be widely read, and I take this as an achievement, for it means my writings work: since genuine depth is unmarketable, they keep the herd instinctively at bay, as if a spell rests upon them. I can’t even say that I do this intentionally; by nature, I speak a higher language.
― Atrona Grizel
There are two kinds of reactions to routine: Sisyphus and Gregor Samsa. And what of those who possess Samsa’s alienation and, like Sisyphus, stubbornly insist on sustaining it?
― Atrona Grizel
The ordinary social world knows Isaac Newton as the “apple man,” whereas he was technically a monk who withdrew into his own world and spent entire days absorbed, almost religiously, in scientific pursuits, so much so that he perhaps could not care about labels society attached to him.
― Atrona Grizel
To make discoveries, there must be no map, because a map means discoveredness.
― Atrona Grizel
There are days when I sit all day doing nothing apparent, and these times are not empty; on the contrary, they are full, because they serve as a kind of subconscious preparation for the days ahead that will be filled with passionate outbursts. A person must be able to have “empty” time.
― Atrona Grizel
I look around me and marvel at how even the elderly have managed to live their entire lives like this without doing anything. They haven’t produced a single thing. By the time I was just fifteen, I already had hundreds of pages of writing. Yet here they are, at fifty, many of them unable even to read or write. How can they live like this? There must be a structural difference in the brain, because what brings them pleasure is not working, but lying down and watching football matches on television. It’s not about judging people by what they produce, but how can a person live for decades without creating any music, without drawing any paintings, without writing anything at all?
― Atrona Grizel
In liberal regimes, lives generally consist of cycles like this: wake up, go to work, work, have fun after work, sleep, and repeat. Totalitarian regimes offer a sense of collective purpose—something these liberal systems cannot provide—and democracies struggle to achieve this because democracy, by its very structure, means fragmentation, which leads to social indifference. You might ask, why is the man standing on the other side of the street there? What purpose does he serve? None. He works a job just to pay his bills. Wearing a suit, he waits at the bus stop. Later he will return home, spend time with his wife, then go to bed, waiting for morning to repeat the same routine. Liberal regimes reduce life to this smallness, because life becomes nothing more than attending to oneself. Yet, when compared to humanity as a whole, the individual is tiny. This is precisely the root of the crises of meaning in modern societies: individuals are deprived of the capacity to create their own meaning, because it has neither been taught to them nor could it be taught without being considered indoctrination. And the state itself is not organized around a collective purpose, such as shaping civilization, but around simple objectives like “ensuring security” and “preserving freedom.” Such hollow liberal societies inevitably push people toward hedonistic lifestyles, because where meaning is absent, pleasure is used as a substitute—romantic shows, flashy clothing, compulsive eating, pornographic games, and countless other distractions. Every failure also belongs to the individual when every choice rests with them, because the state does not define a clear, decisive path for the individual except for mundane topics like schooling and careers, and this, within an environment of excessive stimuli, produces minds devoid of confidence. The real issue, however, is being able to establish a global totalitarian regime that is somehow not corrupt.
― Atrona Grizel
I suppose the USSR’s greatest artistic legacy is neither Futurism nor Realism, but rather the Eastern European aesthetic.
― Atrona Grizel
If the names people give their children are tied to any belief system, I inevitably feel pity for those children, because they are reduced to being called by words that have nothing to do with who they are. Children named with meanings like “Hope,” “Honor,” “Brave,” or “Pious” are reflections of social values. A family that sees hope as a good thing gives that name to their child, thereby ignoring philosophical debates that, for millennia, have rejected hope or regarded it as a mere narcotic. Families that choose names related to honor value being “honorable,” usually associated with traditionalism and conservatism, which indicates that the person is largely removed from an independent, individual mind. A name associated with bravery presents courage as a virtue, even though some thinkers reject both courage and virtue precisely because they are societal constructs. As for names related to piety, there is no need to elaborate: the families are devout and expect their children to be devout as well. In short, giving a name is an assertion of a status and position. The children—unless they possess a rare mind—almost automatically conform to society, raised according to these values their families uphold. Such families can never truly grasp what it means to give a human a name. To them, a child’s name functions as a label reflecting their own values and preferences. Every family does this because society enforces it. Is there anyone without a name? No—everyone is summoned by something. Yet there should be no right to name a child, because to name something is already to assimilate it—to a religion, to a culture, to an ideology. I don’t believe I could ever get along with someone named Muhammad, nor with someone named Benjamin.
― Atrona Grizel
X: “What is your definition of happiness?”
Y: “A villa with a pool, a luxury car, a pet cat, and a beautiful spouse. And yours?”
X: “Not defining it.”
― Atrona Grizel
When I share my writings with the public, my mind remains undernourished, because people are so shallow that they never truly stimulate it. So this time I go instead to places supposedly “designed for deep thought,” to libraries and academies, for example, and share them with the people there. But then I encounter bureaucratic minds instead—mere professors and academics, the sort who can think of nothing beyond “contribution,” “progress,” and career. So what am I supposed to do then? Was reality not supposed to resist such rigid divisions? I carry within me a philosophy of such a kind that all the philosophers of this age—whether ordinary or bureaucratic—would simply stare at it without understanding.
― Atrona Grizel
If someone has produced something that confuses the mind of artificial intelligence, it means they have created something real.
― Atrona Grizel
I am so free to do everything that there is nothing left to do. Everything has been liberated. I can do anything. And precisely because of that, nothing left to be done has any value anymore. If nothing is forbidden, nothing is special. To free the soul is to empty it.
― Atrona Grizel
There has never been a divine place I could withdraw into, drawing inspiration from its sacred silence to write. I’ve never had a private laboratory where I could spend an entire day consumed by excitement. Nor, in the simplest sense, could I even throw myself onto the street when my thoughts became oppressive—because there, too, I would face overload. I only grew up within concrete. Spending years confined to a single room is no small thing. Through it, I’ve developed the capacity for abstraction—the very capacity many prisoners cultivate over time to invent novelty out of nothing.
― Atrona Grizel
If circumstances had allowed, I might already be a polymath. That is, if I had been exposed to extensive guidance and skill-building along these lines. But isn’t this true for everyone? Everyone is always just a little below their real potential, for if opportunity were abundant, anything could have become of them. The janitor here could have been a musician; the cashier over there could have been an astronomer—if only they had been born into a society that respected their interests and genuinely nurtured them. Instead, only certain people acquire these so-called “noble” professions, because society is clearly incapable of fostering an individual’s genuine interests regardless of their career, regardless of their money, regardless of their race, regardless of their age, and regardless of their ideology.
― Atrona Grizel
To define a person by their profession—for example, saying, “He is a lawyer”—reduces a complex being into a mere function. How would those workaholics who prefer this method of definition describe the Buddha? “He was a meditator.” Like that? Or: “He was an ascetic.” Like that? No… He was the one who had gone beyond what can be defined. From the outside, he seemed to be of no use at all—and the secret of his transcendence lay precisely there: he was without function.
― Atrona Grizel
I enter any forum on the internet. Any one. Because every forum disgusts me, structurally. And as I sift through the heap of trash there, I think: “These are the kinds of people reading your writing.” Because I see how simple-minded they are, how easily angered by trivialities, how they turn the most insignificant things into matters of debate, and so on. Since I am my only point of reality, I forget the banality of the world. Yet, because of them, I remember it again and think that every single word I write on the internet falls into the hands of these chimpanzees. Inevitably, I feel disgust, because there is no other internet world. Shall we do an experiment? Let me send this very text I’m writing now to that forum. What reactions would it provoke? First type: “Lol, bro, that is so funny, but too edgy, smh. Ease your senses. Just go out and talk to a girl.” Second type: “You seem too dark. I am interested in gothic anime. We could do cool manga stuff together.” Third type: “Wtf? You seem to have depression. No one sees the world in such a way. I might suggest you a therapist.” Anyone who realizes that such words and sentences form the language of an entire realm will inevitably feel disgusted at using that language—and that’s why, in that place where I read every kind of writing, I never write a single thing anywhere.
― Atrona Grizel
Modern people are often this lax because they usually have a supportive environment behind them. When I made even the smallest mistake, no one was left willing to look me in the face, and so I was abandoned. And once left alone, I found myself able to think at great length even about the smallest things, which led to the development of an unconscious but constant self-monitoring over my behavior, because I became acutely aware of it. But instead of being left alone with their mistakes and forced to think over them again and again, others were accepted despite those mistakes—for reasons such as the humor of friends or the love of a partner. Yet the paradox is precisely this: that is why they have become so lax, because they no longer even recognize mistakes in themselves, having never developed a sensitivity to them through hardship. There was always someone to lean on. They were always watched over, no matter how much destruction they caused around them. They had the luxury of comfort, and that means a lack of awareness, because awareness is something that grows, deepens, and settles into the self together with chronic emotional pain.
― Atrona Grizel
Interviewer: “Where does that air of pride you have come from?”
Cioran: “I survived.”
Me: “I did not grow ignorant among the ignorant.”
― Atrona Grizel
I prefer my own ignorance to the knowledge of the outside, my own stupidity to the intelligence of the external.
― Atrona Grizel








