ICYMI: Free Case Review Don’t Let Pfizer Call the Shots and Hire a Depo-Provera Attorney https://tortadvisor.com/dont-let-pfizer-call-the-shots-and-hire-a-depo-provera-attorney/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr Contact Us Now

ICYMI: Free Case Review Don’t Let Pfizer Call the Shots and Hire a Depo-Provera Attorney https://tortadvisor.com/dont-let-pfizer-call-the-shots-and-hire-a-depo-provera-attorney/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr Contact Us Now

Free Case Review Don’t Let Pfizer Call the Shots and Hire a Depo-Provera Attorney https://tortadvisor.com/dont-let-pfizer-call-the-shots-and-hire-a-depo-provera-attorney/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr Contact Us Now


📢 BioNTech Sues Moderna Over COVID-19 Vaccine Patent Dispute
The biotech world is watching closely as BioNTech files a patent infringement lawsuit against Moderna in a Delaware federal court. The claim: Moderna’s next-generation COVID-19 vaccine, mNEXSPIKE, allegedly violates patents linked to Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine, Comirnaty.
BioNTech argues that mNEXSPIKE uses a patented streamlined mRNA vaccine design that allows effective immunization at lower doses — a key innovation in next-gen vaccine development.
The FDA approved mNEXSPIKE in 2025, positioning it as a major revenue driver for Moderna.
This isn’t the first legal battle between the companies:
With vaccine revenues declining after pandemic highs, intellectual property rights are becoming even more critical. BioNTech’s lawsuit notes that mNEXSPIKE could account for 55% of Moderna’s COVID vaccine revenue for the 2025–26 season — raising the stakes significantly.
This case highlights how intellectual property protection drives innovation in biotechnology. As mRNA technology continues transforming global healthcare, patent rights remain central to competition, collaboration, and future breakthroughs.
📌 Contact @ipconsultinggroup-1 For a Free tailored IP insights and legal guidance:
📧 protect@ipconsultinggroups.com
🌐 www.ipconsultinggroups.com
📞 DC: +1 (202) 666-8377 | MD: +1 (240) 477-6361 | FL: +1 (239) 292-6789

Erika Whittome is taking the New Zealand government to the High Court to challenge the decision to withhold the contract with Pfizer for the supply of Covid-19 vaccines.
The Government has refused to release the contract, citing various reasons, despite numerous requests under the Official Information Act (i.e., Freedom of Information).
Whittome’s court case aims to bring transparency and accountability to the government’s dealings with Pfizer.
The High Court hearing is scheduled for 15 June 2026.
By New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out With Science (“NZDSOS”), 4 January 2026
Like all of us who have been forced to become expert in aspects of the covid response outside our original training, Erika Whittome is on a mission - one shared by many other Kiwis who have asked for the release of the government’s vaccine contract with Pfizer.
As with many others, she requested information under New Zealand (“NZ”) law on the contract for the supply of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines. The information has been withheld and now she challenges this decision in the High Court. Her filing can be seen HERE.
Lawyer Kirsten Murfitt presented her own petition for release to National MP Sam Uffindell in August 2025. NZDSOS presented one of its many Open Letters on deaths and injuries to Winston Peters at Parliament last year, but, seemingly, into the usual black hole. Again we were present to support Greg Rzesniowiecki’s petition to withdraw the injection, which was handed to NZ First to sponsor in the dying days of the 2025 parliament.
Apart from a few whistle-blown snippets, some countries have released their own redacted contracts, showing details of pricing, dose commitments, liability waiver and some other technical details. We know too, that Pfizer says explicitly there is no long-term safety data and the vaccine (gene product) is for “the prevention of covid-19“. By now, most people must agree that it is fraudulent. Further, NZ has admitted it cannot do its own independent analysis (despite Bloomfield’s promise it would) nor “serialise” the vaccine deliveries, which is about sending out consecutive batches in an orderly, trackable manner.
But there is nothing released about severe penalties on sovereign nations for defaulting and the collateral they must put up, the suppression of evidence of harm or banning actual covid treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Government behaviour suggests all of these must loom large in the contract. It is known already that the procurement agreement and liability waiver were signed by Labour ministers even before the clinical trial had been analysed - and all for a product that was substantially different to the one eventually tricked into most Kiwi arms, e.g, see HERE and HERE.
The effort to keep the contract secret is far-reaching, but no longer secret itself. Our Government uses censorship tools on Facebook, and the Department of Internal Affairs has refused to share details of its censorship tool, Facebook’s backdoor “takedown portal.” For example, the US Government used the takedown portal to censor people’s efforts to get at and spread the truth, which was revealed in the case of Missouri v Biden. Of note, this is from one of over a hundred OIA requests made by Erika.
The New Zealand Government entered into a contract with Pfizer (“the Contract”) that resulted in the purchase of 18 million doses of a medicine. That medicine received provisional approval on 3 February 2021 sponsored by Pfizer.
Many members of the public requested copies of the Contract from the Ministry of Health, the Minister of Finance, Treasury and other government agencies under the Official Information Act 1982 (“the OIA”). The procurement for the Contract was an “All-of-Government” purchase.
The various OIA requests were all refused, citing a multitude of reasons.
Erika Whittome requested specific sections of the Contract:
Acknowledging “high public interest,” the Ombudsman released his ‘Final Opinion’ to withhold the Contract in June 2023 and he referred the applicant to this ‘Final Opinion’ in order to refuse to investigate Erika Whittome’s complaints about the requested information being withheld. He said an investigation was “unnecessary.”
Erika Whittome filed this matter in an effort to get transparency and accountability for the people of New Zealand because there appears to be a new allegiance to Pfizer’s commercial interests, instead of transparency to the New Zealand people.
The New Zealand people paid for this Pfizer “medicine” and for all of the negotiations surrounding the Contract. They also pay for the legal costs for negotiation and the information being withheld. Crown Law, the Ombudsman and Pharmac’s legal bills and paperwork generation are also on the taxpayers’ tab.
As Erika notes, the default beneficiary of the NZ taxpayer appears to be Pfizer. We have just written on the “Pfizer Deference” which appears to operate in the courts. This unprecedented dismantling of NZ’s safeguards against commercial exploitation is covered by researcher Nadine Connock in her presentation as part of our ‘Substantial Minority Project’, which aims to lobby the Royal Commission as it writes its report, as well as add to the public repository of evidence.
As NZDSOS has said over and over, some Kiwis have paid with their lives, and others with chronic disability or severe disease. So financial costs to New Zealanders are far more immense than those of thrashing out the contract.
Several data sets suggest that the majority of vaccine recipients are unlikely to make their otherwise healthy life expectancy due to the many ways that system-wide inflammation is damaging hearts, brains, nerves, blood and immunity. We understand this is a terrible thing to say, let alone try fully to comprehend, but any solution starts with acknowledging the problem. Understanding how, what and why the government committed to what it did is our absolute right, and the largely unpaid efforts of Erika, Kirsten, Sue Grey and many others are to that end, and must be supported.
If you wish to help Erika (e.g., contribute to her airfare for the 15 June hearing), please make a donation: Erika Whittome 38-9002-0178268-03
High Court Filing: ERIKA WHITTOME-Judicial review amended claim 14 August 2025
Featured image: New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has been provisionally approved for use in the country and should arrive by March 2021, February 2021. Source: The Guardian
Drug Class:
Indications:
Doses:
Side Effects:
Manufacturer:
Drug Store:
Contraindications:
🧩🔑🪄Part infotainment, part D.I.Y. intuitive scrolling mystery school! Fortified with art, philosophy, memes, music, movies & more!📺 Welcome!🎱#youtuberecommendedchronicles🔮 Find my podcasts #SupplementalBroadcast #PanPanenPiousPropheticPonderings & #BleepzNBloopzandtheOontzOontzOontz on #473x4ndr14 (available on Odysee, YouTube & Rumble)🎙️ Soundtrack & original music available on #C0P3RN1CANR3C0RD5 via SoundCloud & look for #TheC0P3RN1CANDispatch across all major music platforms!!!📻 #TheGreatsResist #TheGreatAwakening #TheGreatTaking #ChosenOnes #Lightworker #Starseed #144K An #OKCopernicus Production. PLUR & art hard!🪬🕯️😱🙏🧿🫶🏼👽👹👼🏼🎪🤹🏽♀️🤡🔥🎟️
I can’t prove it in any scientific way but I know in my soul that the vaccine I was forced to have in 2021 gave me leukeamia. The doctors all said it’s “bad luck” but why the fuck am I supposed to believe that, I was a full time dancer in the prime of my fitness and just got struck with “bad luck” I’m just supposed to believe that these people could make a worldwide vaccine available within months but still can’t figure out why young people get leukaemia LET ALONE FIND A CURE. fuck everybody involved in this.



Resheph, ancient West Semitic god of the plague and of the underworld, the companion of Anath, and the equivalent of the Babylonian god Nergal. He was also a war god and was thus represented as a bearded man brandishing an ax, holding a shield, and wearing a tall, pointed headdress with a goat’s or gazelle’s head on his forehead. Resheph was worshiped especially at Ras Shamra, Byblos, and Arsūf (later Apollonia, near modern Tel Aviv–Yafo). Under the title Mikal (or Mekal), he was also worshiped at Beth-shean in eastern Palestine and at Ialium in Cyprus. Resheph was usually believed to be related to Mot, the god of sterility and death, but he also seems to have been a god of well-being, plenty, and fertility, and in that respect he may have been a form of the god Baal.
Resheph | Canaanite deity, Storm god, Plague god | Britannica

Resheph, ancient West Semitic god of the plague and of the underworld, the companion of Anath, and the equivalent of the Babylonian god Nergal. He was also a war god and was thus represented as a bearded man brandishing an ax, holding a shield, and wearing a tall, pointed headdress with a goat’s or gazelle’s head on his forehead. Resheph was worshiped especially at Ras Shamra, Byblos, and Arsūf (later Apollonia, near modern Tel Aviv–Yafo). Under the title Mikal (or Mekal), he was also worshiped at Beth-shean in eastern Palestine and at Ialium in Cyprus. Resheph was usually believed to be related to Mot, the god of sterility and death, but he also seems to have been a god of well-being, plenty, and fertility, and in that respect he may have been a form of the god Baal.
source: Britannica Editors. “Resheph”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 13 Sep. 2015, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Resheph. Accessed 16 November 2025.