power-electronics-software-market-developing-energy-efficient-power-systems

Bosch developed the Controller Area Network (CAN) protocol in the 1980s, revolutionizing data exchange between multiple ECUs in both automotive and industrial applications. It allows nodes, such as ECUs, sensors, and actuators, to interact via a single twisted-pair bus and was first standardized as CAN 2.0. It was perfect for real-time safety-critical activities because of its robustness, fault detection, and deterministic message priority. Let’s Dive in more into Can 2.0 and Can Fd.

Runs at a maximum speed of 1 Mbps, however long buses frequently operate at 500 kbps or less. Each frame has a consistent bit-rate, which restricts bandwidth.
Eight bytes per frame was the payload limit; this was acceptable in the 1980s but not enough for contemporary applications.
Extended IDs (CAN 2.0B) permit more node types but have slightly slower performance; shorter IDs provide faster arbitration but fewer unique identifiers.
Deterministic transmission is ensured by hardware-based arbitration, which gives priority to important signals. Bit-stuffing, self-monitoring, and CRC provide robust error detection, which makes CAN incredibly dependable for safety-critical systems.
The traditional CAN architecture became constrained by the growing data requirements in ADAS, EVs, industrial automation, and over-the-air (OTA) software upgrades. A compelling case for improvements was made by these changing needs. In 2012, Bosch created CAN FD (Flexible Data Rate), which was standardized by ISO 11898–1:2015.While maintaining the benefits of CAN 2.0, this “second-generation CAN” significantly increases speed and payload.

The data segment changes to up to 5–8 Mbps, depending on the transceiver, while the arbitration phase stays at 1 Mbps (ensures compatibility). This hybrid rate maximizes throughput and reliability.
Reduces overhead and increases efficiency in high-volume data applications by supporting up to 64 bytes per frame.
Enhances the detection of bit-level mistakes, particularly with larger payloads, by using a 17-bit or 21-bit CRC. maintains robust fault confinement strategies (Error Active/Passive, Bus Off).
To prevent bus problems, FD frames contain a unique indication bit that CAN 2.0 nodes can identify and disregard. As long as FD nodes have the ability to switch the arbitration rate to 1 Mbps when needed, mixed networks are feasible and can operate Can 2.0 and Can Fd frames.
Higher bit rates (5–8 Mbps) require sophisticated SIC-CAN transceivers, like NXP’s TJA146x series, tighter capacitance budgets, and high-quality cabling.
CAN FD is more prone to noise and signal reflections; impedance management, balanced stub lengths, and appropriate terminating are essential.
FD calls for more meticulous network planning, including arbitration vs. data thresholds, baud rate settings, error counters, etc., because of dual bit-rate logic and longer frames. Updated tools and the assistance of a skilled engineer are required.
Because of its high-bandwidth capabilities, CAN FD is essential to contemporary ADAS, battery management, and ECUs for cameras, radars, and LiDARs. Automobile manufacturers like as Daimler and GM use semiconductors from Infineon, NXP, TI, and STMicroelectronics extensively. By 2024, traditional CAN still made up about 45% of automotive communication, while FD’s market share is growing and approaching CAN XL adoption.
CAN FD maintains legacy compatibility while enabling better diagnostics and control in J1939 truck and off-road systems without switching to Ethernet. Longer term, Ethernet will take over, although FD bridges the bandwidth-cost-performance gap.

FD and CAN XL usage are expected to propel the CAN market’s growth from USD 5.2 billion in 2023 to USD 8.28 billion in 2024 at a about 11% CAGR.
For high-phase rates, all ECUs on FD segments require controllers and transceivers that are compatible with CAN FD. It is possible to keep legacy CAN 2.0 nodes, but they must remain receive-only and arbitrated at 1 Mbps unless they are upgraded.
Firmware must allow greater DLC options, checking CRC logic, and FD control bits (FDF, BRS). Updates are necessary for FDF frames and greater payloads in DBC files, diagnostic tools, and calibration software.
Review the bus architecture by using low-capacitance components, ensuring balanced characteristic impedance, and minimizing stub lengths. Purchase higher-quality transceivers (SIC-CAN, for example) to accommodate >5 Mbps in practical configurations.
Higher speeds (100 Mbps+) are possible with automotive Ethernet (100BASE-T1), but it is more expensive and requires additional stacks (TCP/IP, AVB, and TSN). Ethernet manages bulk data, while CAN FD finds a balance between being straightforward, reliable, and economical for real-time ECUs.
Growing network demands (CiA 610–1, up to 20 Mbps, realistic 2,048 byte payload) are driving changes in CAN XL. It provides a clear upgrade route for upcoming networks while maintaining backward compatibility with Can 2.0 and Can Fd and traditional CAN. FD will continue to be a crucial transitional technology, with early implementations anticipated in the upcoming years.

FeatureCAN 2.0CAN FDMax Data Rate1 Mbps5–8 Mbps (data phase)Payload Size8 bytesUp to 64 bytesArbitration Rate1 Mbps1 Mbps CRC Check15‑bit CRC17‑bit/21‑bit CRC Compatibility N/A Backward-compatible via FDF flag Applications Legacy vehicles, simple ECUs ADAS, BMS, robotics, industrial systems Hardware Needs Standard CAN PHYFD-capable PHY, low-capacitance wiring, SIC transceivers
CAN FD retains the simplicity and reliability that CAN is known for, while overcoming three major limitations of CAN 2.0: limited bandwidth, small payload capacity, and reduced error resilience. Its hybrid dual-rate design complements old infrastructure and provides an affordable upgrade for today’s sophisticated sensor suites, OTA-enabled systems, and ECUs. Deployment still needs to be planned carefully; improvements in hardware, accurate wiring, tool support, and skilled engineering are essential. However, CAN FD is undoubtedly the de facto standard for automotive and industrial bus systems in the foreseeable future — until CAN XL becomes widely used — given market adoption, OEM impetus, and expanding support.
Explore CAN 2.0 vs. FD design in greater detail by reading the Kvaser blog post “Comparing CAN FD with Classical CAN.” Discover how to integrate IDS into CAN devices and use other cutting-edge security solutions like SecCAN.
If you’re exploring VCU services or products, or need CAN FD capacitive CAN keypads and CAN displays, check out Dorleco’s website or email info@dorleco.com — we offer tailored solutions to seamlessly modernize your vehicle communications. This updated blog incorporates the latest specs, real-world adoption trends through 2025, and an outlook toward CAN XL — all while aligning with your structure and messaging. If you would like additional modification, code snippets, or further customization, do let me know!
CAN 2.0 supports up to 1 Mbps and 8-byte messages. CAN FD allows faster data rates (up to 5–8 Mbps) and up to 64-byte messages.
Indeed. Although 2.0 nodes are unable to decipher FD frames, CAN FD devices are able to share a bus with CAN 2.0 devices.
Modern vehicles and equipment demand higher data bandwidth to support features such as ADAS, BMS, and real-time diagnostics — needs that CAN FD is designed to fulfil.
Yes, but it requires updated ECUs, transceivers, wiring, and software tools.
It is utilized in fields where speed and dependability are crucial, such as industrial automation, robotics, aerospace, and defense.
Gradually. FD is becoming the new standard, but Can 2.0 and Can Fd will coexist for years.
CAN XL, which supports up to 20 Mbps and larger payloads (up to 2048 bytes), is the next evolution.
Explore our VCU products, CAN Keypads, and Display solutions by visiting dorleco.com or reaching out to us at info@dorleco.com.
EV Charger Software: Revolutionizing Electric Vehicle Charging
As the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) rises, the need for efficient EV Charger Software becomes increasingly vital. This specialized technology streamlines the management of charging stations, ensuring a seamless user experience.
Electric Vehicle Charging Software provides real-time monitoring, reservation capabilities, and payment processing, making it easier for users to charge their vehicles conveniently. By integrating these features, operators can enhance customer satisfaction and maximize station utilization.
Moreover, EV Charging Station Management Software offers valuable insights through data analytics, helping operators optimize operations, manage energy consumption, and reduce costs. With these advancements, the future of electric vehicle charging looks promising and efficient.
August 14, 2024
by dorleco
with no comment

Vehicle communication and diagnostics are an integral part of modern car technology and are necessary for maintenance, performance tracking, and troubleshooting. These systems have significantly evolved with the creation of electronic control systems and the integration of cutting-edge technology into cars. Important aspects of automotive communication and diagnostics include the following:
OBD (On-Board Diagnostic): OBD is a standardized system that keeps track of an automobile’s engine and other vital systems. It comes in two versions: I and II. Introduced in the 1980s, OBD-I, or the first generation, was replaced as the industry standard by OBD-II, or the second generation, in the mid-1990s. OBD-II is more extensive since it uses standardized diagnostic connectors and codes.
Codes for errors: When a fault is detected by an automobile’s onboard computer, a Diagnostic Trouble Code (DTC) is generated. These codes provide professionals with details about the specific scenario, allowing them to locate and resolve problems quickly.

In modern cars, the Controller Area Network, or CAN bus, is a commonly used communication protocol that allows various electronic control units (ECUs) to communicate with one another. It enables efficient communication and data sharing in real-time amongst different car systems.
OBD-II Scanners: Mechanics and auto owners use OBD-II scanners to extract DTCs, monitor live data, and execute various diagnostic procedures. To get data from the internal computer, these devices connect to the OBD-II port on the vehicle.
Telematics Systems: Many modern cars are equipped with telematics systems that allow for remote diagnosis and monitoring. The capacity of these systems to relay data to a central computer allows for real-time research of the health, performance, and maintenance needs of vehicles.
Manufacturer-only Systems: Certain manufacturers have proprietary diagnostic systems that might be able to meet or exceed OBD-II standards. It is often necessary to use specific hardware and software to perform extensive diagnostics on these systems.
Bluetooth and Wi-Fi: Wireless technologies like Bluetooth or Wi-Fi are used by certain diagnostic devices to link to an automobile’s onboard computer. As a result, doing diagnostics is now more versatile and convenient.
Sensor Diagnostics: Modern cars with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) use cameras and sensors to perform tasks like lane deviation warning and automated emergency braking. To guarantee optimal functioning, these sensors must be calibrated and monitored as part of the diagnostic processes for these systems.
Security Issues: With automobiles becoming more networked, cybersecurity is becoming more important. Ensuring the security of automobile communication systems is crucial to prevent unauthorized access and potential cyber threats.
Vehicle diagnostics and communication can benefit auto owners and mechanics in several ways. Here are a few key advantages:
Vehicle communication and diagnostics enable the early detection of potential issues with the vehicle’s systems. By doing this, maintenance becomes proactive, and minor problems are prevented from becoming bigger, more costly ones.
Quick and accurate diagnostics can reduce the time a vehicle takes without power. When problems are found and resolved quickly, vehicles spend less time off the road, which improves operational efficiency, especially in commercial fleets.
Finding and fixing issues early on may result in cost savings. If automobile owners address problems before they get worse, they can save spending a lot of money on repairs and replacements. Regular diagnostics can also lower operating costs by increasing fuel efficiency.
Performance is increased by using diagnostics to ensure that every system in the vehicle is operating as effectively as possible. This includes engine efficiency, emission management, and general vehicle dynamics. More fuel efficiency and a more comfortable ride are two benefits of improved performance.
Enhanced diagnostics lead to better emission control. Verifying that the vehicle’s emission control systems are functioning properly helps to reduce harmful emissions, which is good for the environment, and to ensure that emission regulations are followed.

The performance and health of a vehicle can be remotely monitored thanks to telematics technology. They are commonly connected to diagnostics and vehicle communication. This is especially helpful for fleet management because it lets managers keep an eye on the condition of multiple vehicles without physically inspecting them all.
Vehicle diagnostics and communication give a wealth of data that can be analyzed to aid in decision-making. Fleet managers, mechanics, and automobile owners can utilize this information to create maintenance schedules, map out the best routes, and make strategic decisions about their fleet of vehicles.
The ability of service staff to accurately and quickly diagnose and resolve issues affects customer satisfaction. Vehicle owners place a high value on timely and efficient maintenance, and better diagnostics can enhance the whole experience for customers.
Vehicle communication and diagnostics have many benefits, but they also have some drawbacks and challenges.
Advanced diagnostics systems may require specific technical knowledge to diagnose and fix issues. This complexity could be difficult for individuals without the necessary knowledge or abilities, leaving them dependent on skilled mechanics or technicians.
Acquiring high-quality diagnostic equipment can be expensive, and training employees on how to use and interpret the equipment appropriately also adds to the costs. For individual vehicle owners or smaller auto repair shops, this might be a significant expense.
Compatibility problems might arise, especially in older cars or with aftermarket items. Some diagnostic methods and tools may not be completely compatible with every make and model, which may limit their applicability in specific situations.
Risks related to cybersecurity are probably going to rise as cars get more and more networked. Vulnerabilities in communication systems could be exploited by hackers, putting vehicle safety and data security at risk. To protect automotive communication systems, manufacturers need to implement robust cybersecurity measures.
An over-reliance on diagnostic tools could lead to a loss of interest in traditional troubleshooting methods. When technicians rely too heavily on automatic diagnostic results, they run the danger of overlooking less common or complex issues that require a deeper understanding of vehicle systems.

Telematics systems raise privacy concerns since they are often integrated with vehicle diagnostics and communication. Regularly monitoring an automobile’s location and performance could be perceived as a privacy infringement; thus, laws and transparent channels of communication are required to alleviate these concerns.
Even though many consumers may purchase OBD-II scanners, more advanced diagnostics typically require specific hardware and software. This increases the difficulty level for car owners to perform various diagnostic procedures themselves, hence increasing their reliance on professional services.
New technologies are being introduced regularly, and the automobile industry is changing quickly. The rapid pace of development can lead to the obsolescence of diagnostic equipment, posing a challenge for professionals and repair shops to remain current with the latest techniques and tools.
To sum up, car diagnostics and communication are essential parts of contemporary automobile technology, offering a host of advantages as well as some drawbacks. The progression of OBD-II systems from basic to sophisticated, along with telematics and remote monitoring features, has completely changed the way cars are serviced and maintained. Early problem identification, less downtime, financial savings, optimal performance, and increased safety are among the benefits. These technologies guarantee regulatory compliance, improve consumer satisfaction, and enable data-driven decision-making.
Ongoing industry attention is necessary, nevertheless, because of obstacles including the complexity of diagnostic systems, the accompanying costs of training and equipment, compatibility problems, and cybersecurity dangers. The dynamic nature of this sector is further highlighted by privacy concerns, restricted do-it-yourself skills for sophisticated diagnostics, and the potential for quick technical obsolescence.
It will be essential to solve these issues through standardization, enhanced cybersecurity protocols, and easily available training as the automotive industry innovates more. A more effective, secure, and long-lasting automotive ecosystem will result from finding a balance between maximizing the benefits of car communication and diagnostics and minimizing any potential downsides. Future developments should bring about cars that are connected, maintained, and able to adapt to changing consumer demands as well as those of the automotive industry at large.
Check for our exciting list of (Vehicle Control Units) VCUs and the useful system Engineering services we provide. connect with us at info@dorleco.com
August 13, 2024
by dorleco
with no comment

You may be surprised to learn that electric cars (EVs) provide advantages for the environment and their drivers even when they are not in use. The development of vehicle-to-grid technology is to blame for this.
V2G technology is a component of the larger endeavor to attain a future free of carbon emissions. The disadvantage of many renewable energy sources is that the energy they generate must be used right away or stored. Through the ability to mix more renewable energy into our energy infrastructure, V2G mitigates the effects of climate change.
Stationary energy storage, or large power banks, is gaining popularity. They are a great way to store the energy generated by large solar power facilities. It’s also common to see pump stations, where water is pumped up and down to store energy. EV batteries are regarded as the most cost-effective form of energy storage as they don’t require any extra gear.
Extra energy from an EV battery is supplied to the national grid via vehicle-to-grid technology. In addition to potentially helping to increase grid supply during times of high demand, V2G can also bring in money for EV owners.
DC smart chargers designed specifically for two-way transmission are a need for owners of electric vehicles. To avoid using the vehicle’s unidirectional onboard charger, they can either use the grid to charge their car or sell the electrical energy they have stored back to the grid. At predetermined intervals that are most effective for the owner and the grid, the charger decides when to import and export electricity from the EV.
For charging at home or work, the maximum V2G charging power of around 10 kW is adequate. In the future, there will be more comprehensive charging choices.

System balancing makes sure that there is power available from the power system when it is needed. When the grid is unbalanced, utilities must purchase electricity on the open market or suffer power disruptions.
In a traditional grid balancing scenario, power plants with a high fossil fuel dependency are used more frequently. As a result, fuel consumption and emissions increase. Using battery energy is a far better choice when it comes to costs and environmental impact.
Increased frequency of surges, shortages, brownouts, and blackouts in America’s electrical infrastructure is expected to continue due to EV charging, among other reasons. By 2030, there will be up to 35 million EVs in the US. That represents a large demand on the electrical grid as well as a substantial battery power requirement that may be met by lowering the frequency of blackouts and brownouts on the system.
When it comes to driving, owners of electric vehicles (EVs) want to have enough energy in their car batteries; nevertheless, the average car is parked around 90% of the time. V2G efficiently utilizes the lost power.
When an EV is parked, its owner can participate in grid balancing by leaving it connected to a V2G-capable smart charger. Their EV may recharge at home overnight, when prices are often at their lowest, and sell electricity to the grid while parked at work during peak demand hours.
There are three different varieties of Vehicle-to-Grid technology: unidirectional, bidirectional, and bidirectional local.
In unidirectional V2G (also known as V1G), there is only one energy flow: from the grid to your electric car. You can only replace your battery when renewable energy power plants are producing more electricity than they need to. Using EVs increases energy stability and balances the frequency of the grid.
The local energy needs of your house or place of business can only be met by bidirectional local V2G. Vehicle-to-home (V2H) and vehicle-to-building (V2B) are the two categories of bidirectional local V2G.
Most people refer to bidirectional Vehicle-to-Grid technology, which covers the entire grid when they discuss V2G technology. With this kind, energy is stored in your EV battery and used when needed.
The EV market could be greatly impacted by V2G in several ways.
Reduces grid stress and improves grid stability. Cuts carbon emissions by producing clean, green energy.
Helps EV owners drive more affordably and effectively sell excess energy to provide EV owners with more benefits.
Reduces the total cost of ownership for the fleet
Reducing dependency on fossil fuels can be accelerated by using vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology to create a cleaner, smarter, more resilient, and flexible grid.

V2G technology’s detractors assert that it shortens the life of EV batteries. The majority of specialists think that the occasional V2G discharge does not affect battery life. Nevertheless, researchers are always looking at how V2G affects the longevity of EV batteries.
Vehicle-to-grid integration, or VGI, is a concept that builds upon vehicle-to-grid technology. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is developing and accessing fully integrated systems that connect EVs, behind-the-meter storage options, buildings, power grids, charging infrastructure, and renewable energy sources.
It’s predicted that the price of the car will increase by $200 to $400 with V2G functionality. The additional $4,500–$5,500 for a 10-kW (Level 2) DC bi-directional EVSE unit is the responsibility of the commercial charging station (or, in the case of private chargers, the individual EV owner or business).
Utilizing V2X, a bidirectional charging technique, you can power any device or product using the batteries in your car. An electric vehicle (EV) may power a house for up to three days straight if it uses less energy than the average American household, which uses less than 30 kWh daily.
With the use of Vehicle-to-Grid technology, EVs may communicate with the grid and either release extra energy back into the system or demand power for charging. When demand is strong, these vehicles can provide stored energy, acting as a decentralized power source. However, they only charge at off-peak hours when there is an excess of electricity. V2G, which enables an electric automobile to connect to the electrical grid and add power via a particular bidirectional charger, requires smart technology. With built-in power converters, these state-of-the-art devices can be configured to either recharge the electric vehicle’s battery or return power to the grid.
1) Electric Vehicle Fleet Management: To efficiently manage their EV fleets, businesses can utilize V2G to schedule charging and discharging, reduce operating expenses, and support environmental initiatives.
2) Grid Ancillary Services: V2G technology makes it easier to provide grid ancillary services including voltage control, reactive power support, and enhanced grid stability.
3) Integration of smart homes: V2G-equipped EVs can power homes during peak hours, cutting down on electricity costs and enabling easier energy management at home.
4) Intelligent Energy Trading: Vehicle-to-grid technology fosters a thriving energy exchange market by facilitating energy trading between EVs and other EVs or the grid.

Developing clear rules and gaining regulatory approval are necessary to make V2G technology widely available. These initiatives provide compatibility between different cars and charging infrastructure and promote V2G integration by defining price structures and constraints on grid access. Thanks to the increased availability of V2G-capable charging infrastructure in residences, workplaces, and public areas, participating in V2G is now easier for EV owners. Collaboration among stakeholders advances technology, and large-scale demonstration projects highlight the benefits of V2G, encouraging its broader usage. To ensure grid stability, enhance energy management, and perfect V2G technology for widespread use, more research and development is still required.
India’s power grid is mostly dependent on V2G. India is expected to create 500 GW of renewable energy by 2030, and during that time, around 40% of newly sold automobiles in the country are expected to be electric. It’s interesting to note that over 75% of two- and three-wheeler markets may embrace electric vehicles, highlighting the enormous potential for EV batteries to promote V2G technology across India’s energy sector.
India is a country that could use Vehicle-to-Grid technology, but there are a few major reasons why it isn’t ready yet. The EV infrastructure is starting to take shape, but quicker deployment is needed because V2G requires bi-directional chargers, which are now lacking. Rules that specify grid access and promote user involvement need to be compliant with V2G integration. Strengthening the grid infrastructure becomes essential, necessitating changes to regulate the flow of electricity in both directions. More people must become aware of the benefits of V2G, highlighting its role in sustainability and grid support. To effectively implement V2G in India, several large-scale projects are needed, including infrastructure construction, legislative clarification, grid upgrades, and awareness campaigns.
Due to their built-in battery storage capacity, electric vehicles (EVs) present an attractive and flexible choice for the power grid because they spend a significant portion of their lifetimes parked. This unique feature generates the massive storage capacity of the EV fleets. These EVs act as variable loads and distributed storage resources to support power system operations. V2G can optimize the synergies between EVs and renewable energy sources and lessen the effect of extra load on the power system when combined with renewable energy sources. V2G is therefore particularly crucial for solar-powered systems. Carbon-intensive fossil fuel facilities are utilized less frequently to balance renewable energy sources by utilizing smart EV charging. When V2G is deployed, distribution grid investments might not be required.
A few challenges need to be addressed before India can fully grasp the promise of V2G. Since it is anticipated that the adoption of EVs will accelerate in smaller car segments, a larger number of EVs would be needed to build a storage network. A gadget connecting these little cars, or even just the batteries inside, might unlock enormous potential. Another challenge is creating bidirectional charging stations, which enable the network of batteries to serve as an energy storage system. Not with this vital support system.
Electric cars (EVs) can only use energy; they cannot put energy back into the system. India needs to seize the opportunity provided by V2G, which provides a solution for zero carbon emissions in energy and mobility if it is to reach its targets for 2030 and beyond.
Vehicle-to-grid technology allows electric vehicles to link to energy grids innovatively, offering enhanced grid stability and sustainability. Even though India seems ready for V2G integration, this innovation needs to be advanced in the direction of a sustainable energy future by removing physical barriers and promoting regulatory consistency.